Zenn v. Anzalone

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM
• Citation: Zenn v. Anzalone, 146 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
• Decision Date: 13 December 1955
• Parties: Sadie ZENN, Freda Blumenthal, Henry Mencher, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. J. J. ANZALONE, Frank B. Bateman et al., Clint W. Murchison, et al., and Robert R. Young, et al., etc., Defendants-Respondents. Samuel R. Rosen, Petitioner-Appellant.

Page 286

146 N.Y.S.2d 286

1 A.D.2d 662

Sadie ZENN, Freda Blumenthal, Henry Mencher, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. J. J. ANZALONE, Frank B. Bateman et al., Clint W. Murchison, et al., and Robert R. Young, et al., etc., Defendants-Respondents. Samuel R. Rosen, Petitioner-Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Dec. 13, 1955.

S. Graubard, New York City, for appellant.

A. L. Pomerantz, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents.

T. F. Daly, F. W. H. Adams, New York City, for defendants-respondents.

Before PECK, P. J., and BREITEL, BASTOW and COX, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. We construe the order of reference, in entitling appellant to raise any question as to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the settlement, to include the issue and the effect, if any, of the exclusion of persons from the negotiations for settlement. We assume that unless there is an adverse effect on the settlement by reason of such exclusion, exclusion will not have been shown to be improper. Order filed.