Zhu v. Barr, 061119 FED2, 17-3526 NAC

Docket Nº:17-3526 NAC
Party Name:BO XING ZHU, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
Attorney:FOR PETITIONER: ZHOU WANG, ESQ., NEW YORK, NY. FOR RESPONDENT: CHAD A. READLER, ACTING ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL; NANCY FRIEDMAN, SENIOR LITIGATION COUNSEL; KEVIN J. CONWAY, TRIAL ATTORNEY, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON, DC.
Judge Panel:PRESENT JOSÉ A. CABRANES, RICHARD C. WESLEY, SUSAN L. CARNEY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
Case Date:June 11, 2019
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

BO XING ZHU, Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

No. 17-3526 NAC

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

June 11, 2019

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of June, two thousand nineteen.

FOR PETITIONER: ZHOU WANG, ESQ., NEW YORK, NY.

FOR RESPONDENT: CHAD A. READLER, ACTING ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL; NANCY FRIEDMAN, SENIOR LITIGATION COUNSEL; KEVIN J. CONWAY, TRIAL ATTORNEY, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON, DC.

PRESENT JOSÉ A. CABRANES, RICHARD C. WESLEY, SUSAN L. CARNEY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED.

Petitioner Bo Xing Zhu, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of an October 17, 2017 decision of the BIA affirming a February 22, 2017 decision of an Immigration Judge ("IJ") denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). In re Bo Xing Zhu, No. A206 311 555 (B.I.A. Oct. 17, 2017), aff'g No. A206 311 555 (Immig. Ct. N.Y.C. Feb. 22, 2017). We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

We have reviewed both the IJ's and the BIA's opinions "for the sake of completeness." Wangchuck v. Dep't of Homeland Security, 448 F.3d 524, 528 (2d...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP