Zink v. Lombardi

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationZink v. Lombardi, 134 S. Ct. 1790, 188 L.Ed.2d 760, 572 U.S. 1047 (2014)
Decision Date07 April 2014
Docket NumberNo. 13–8435.,13–8435.
Parties David S. ZINK, et al., petitioners, v. George A. LOMBARDI, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Zink v. Lombardi
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 6, 2015
    ...drug. In re Lombardi, 741 F.3d 888, 892 (8th Cir.) (en banc), reh'g denied, 741 F.3d 903 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1790, 188 L.Ed.2d 760 (2014). This court issued a writ of mandamus vacating the district court's order requiring disclosure. Id. at 897. We determined ......
  • West v. Schofield
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • March 10, 2015
    ... ... In re Lombardi , 741 F.3d 888, 894 (8th Cir.2014) (en banc) (referring to an October 2013 letter “from a compounding pharmacy ... that demanded the Texas ... ...
  • Wellons v. Comm'r
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • June 17, 2014
    ... ... denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1787, 188 L.Ed.2d 612 (2014); In re Lombardi, 741 F.3d 888, 896–97 (8th Cir.2014) (“Without a plausible allegation of a feasible and more humane alternative method of execution, or a ... ...
  • West v. Schofield
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • March 10, 2015
    ... ... In re Lombardi , 741 F.3d 888, 894 (8th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (referring to an October 2013 letter "from a compounding pharmacy ... that demanded the Page 12 Texas ... ...
  • Get Started for Free