Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., No. 20-1149
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | SUTTON, Circuit Judge. |
| Citation | 980 F.3d 520 |
| Parties | Donna Jean ZIRBEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, as Sponsor and Plan Administrator for the Ford Motor Company General Retirement Plan, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 20-1149 |
| Decision Date | 16 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Messing v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., s. 21-2780/21-2790
...automatically attach; but if the funds were used to purchase consumables, such as food, no lien could attach. Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co. , 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020).Provident asked the district court to impose either an equitable lien for restitution or an equitable lien by agreement ......
-
Am. Elec. Power Serv. Corp. v. Fitch, 22-3005
...for reimbursement under § 502(a)(3)(B) of ERISA is one for "'restitution in equity,' not 'restitution at law.'" Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Great-West Life &Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson, 534 U.S. 204, 213-14 (2002)); see also Sereboff v. Mid. Atl. Med......
-
Mullins v. Securian Life Insurance Co., 2:21-cv-247-SPC-NPM
...(Doc. 22 at 102); 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3); Sereboff v. Mid Atl. Med. Servs., Inc., 547 U.S. 356, 362-67 (2006); Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 522, 524-25 (6th Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 17; 21) GRANTED in part. 2. Plaintiffs......
-
Zahuranec v. Cigna Heathcare, Inc., 1:19cv2781
...the malfeasance that estoppel requires.” Crosby v. Rohm & Haas Co., 480 F.3d 423, 431 (6th Cir. 2007). See also, Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020) (finding no equitable estoppel where, although defendant miscalculated plaintiff's lump sum retirement payment, defend......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Messing v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., s. 21-2780/21-2790
...automatically attach; but if the funds were used to purchase consumables, such as food, no lien could attach. Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co. , 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020).Provident asked the district court to impose either an equitable lien for restitution or an equitable lien by agreement ......
-
Am. Elec. Power Serv. Corp. v. Fitch, 22-3005
...for reimbursement under § 502(a)(3)(B) of ERISA is one for "'restitution in equity,' not 'restitution at law.'" Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Great-West Life &Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson, 534 U.S. 204, 213-14 (2002)); see also Sereboff v. Mid. Atl. Med......
-
Mullins v. Securian Life Insurance Co., 2:21-cv-247-SPC-NPM
...(Doc. 22 at 102); 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3); Sereboff v. Mid Atl. Med. Servs., Inc., 547 U.S. 356, 362-67 (2006); Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 522, 524-25 (6th Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 17; 21) GRANTED in part. 2. Plaintiffs......
-
Zahuranec v. Cigna Heathcare, Inc., 1:19cv2781
...the malfeasance that estoppel requires.” Crosby v. Rohm & Haas Co., 480 F.3d 423, 431 (6th Cir. 2007). See also, Zirbel v. Ford Motor Co., 980 F.3d 520, 524 (6th Cir. 2020) (finding no equitable estoppel where, although defendant miscalculated plaintiff's lump sum retirement payment, defend......
Request a trial to view additional results