Zorn v. State, 30479

Decision Date04 March 1959
Docket NumberNo. 30479,30479
CitationZorn v. State, 321 S.W.2d 90, 167 Tex.Crim. 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
PartiesLeroy ZORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

[167 TEXCRIM 502] Spence & Martin, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

L. T. Wilson, Dist. Atty., Wichita Falls, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for keeping and exhibiting a gaming table and bank for the purpose of gaming; the punishment, two years.

The disposition hereof makes a summary of the facts unnecessary.

Formal Bill of Exception No. 3 shows that the trial court permitted the state to introduce the affidavit, search warrant and return made thereon into evidence before the jury over appellant's objection that they were hearsay. Such instruments were hearsay and prejudicial to the rights of the appellant; should not have been admitted in evidence before the jury, and calls for a reversal. 37-B Tex.Jur. 489, Sec. 36; 3 Branch's Ann.P.C.2d 106, Sec. 1335; Hall v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 320, 125 S.W.2d 293; Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169; Hebert v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Baxter v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2001
    ...v. State, 473 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Tex.Crim.App.1971); Tucker v. State, 170 Tex.Crim. 113, 339 S.W.2d 64, 64 (1960); Zorn v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 502, 321 S.W.2d 90, 90 (1959); Hicks v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 115, 318 S.W.2d 652, 652 (1958); Dillon v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. 642, 2 S.W.2d 251, 251 (......
  • Pratt v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 1988
    ...was reversible error, without stating any analysis. E.g., Tucker v. State, 170 Tex.Crim. 113, 339 S.W.2d 64 (1960); Zorn v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 502, 321 S.W.2d 90 (1959); Hicks v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 115, 318 S.W.2d 652 (1958) (the affidavit was only read to the jury, not introduced into ......
  • Tucker v. State, 32181
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 12, 1960
    ...504, 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512; Hicks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 652; and Zorn v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 321 S.W.2d 90. The record further shows that State's counsel was permitted, over appellant's objection, to question a witness for the appell......
  • Albitez v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 9, 1970
    ...and seizures of the State of Texas. If the Court wants those of record. * * *' This Court has consistently held in Zorn v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 502, 321 S.W.2d 90, and Hicks v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 115, 318 S.W.2d 652, that it constitutes error for the court to admit the affidavit and the s......
  • Get Started for Free