Zsarko v. Angelozzi, A159271(S064594)

Citation361 Or. 312,393 P.3d 1174 (Table)
Decision Date30 March 2017
Docket NumberA159271(S064594)
Parties ZSARKO, James Nathaniel Dustin v. ANGELOZZI
CourtSupreme Court of Oregon

Review Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Ingle v. Matteucci
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • October 27, 2021
    ...... Zsarko v. Angelozzi , 281 Or. App. 506, 508, 385 P.3d 1239 (2016), rev. den. , 361 Or. 312, 393 P.3d ......
  • Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • December 15, 2021
    ...the claim. We review that ruling for legal error. Zsarko v. Angelozzi , 281 Or.App. 506, 508, 385 P.3d 1239 (2016), rev. den. , 361 Or. 312, 393 P.3d 1174 (2017).On appeal, plaintiffs reprise their arguments made before the trial court. They contend that ORS 12.115(1) does not apply to thei......
  • Ingle v. Matteucci, A170009
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • October 27, 2021
    ...face, as permitted by ORCP 21 A(9), we review for legal error. Zsarko v. Angelozzi, 281 Or.App. 506, 508, 385 P.3d 1239 (2016), rev den, 361 Or. 312 (2017). Our review is limited to the face of the petition. Id. Like the postconviction court, we must "assume the truth of all allegations in ......
  • Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • December 15, 2021
    ...barred the claim. We review that ruling for legal error. Zsarko v. Angelozzi, 281 Or.App. 506, 508, 385 P.3d 1239 (2016), rev den, 361 Or. 312 (2017). On appeal, plaintiffs reprise their arguments made before the trial court. They contend that ORS 12.115(1) [316 Or.App. 423] 7 does not appl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT