Zubkis v. U.S., 97-55568
Citation | 133 F.3d 931 |
Decision Date | 12 January 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 97-55568,97-55568 |
Parties | NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven ZUBKIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Roger Lange; D. True Brown, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Steven Zubkis appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) action seeking return of property seized while he was under investigation for securities fraud and associated crimes. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Specialty Fulfillment Ctr. (Dba Ac Fillers) 3 17TH Ave. S.
...shown an inadequate remedy at law. See Zubkis v. Lange, 966 F. Supp. 985, 987 (S.D. Cal. 1997), aff'd sub nom. Zubkis v. United States, 133 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 1998) (finding that because an indictment may still issue, plaintiff could challenge the seizure in the criminal proceedings and the......
- U.S. v. Standard, 96-50407