California
Court
Report Series
- California Reporter (Cal.Rptr.) (43648)
- Pacific Reporter, second series (P.2d) (43515)
- Pacific Reporter (P.) (36964)
- California Appellate Reports, Second Series (Cal.App.2d) (35232)
- California Reports (Cal.) (28170)
- California Appellate, Fourth Series (Cal.App.4th) (27272)
- California Appellate Reports, Third Series (Cal.App.3d) (25396)
- California Appellate Reports (Cal.App.) (20023)
- California Reporter, second series (Cal.Rptr.2d) (15390)
- California Reporter, third series (Cal.Rptr.3d) (8766)
- California Reports, Second Series (Cal.2d) (6483)
- Pacific Reporter, third series (P.3d) (4104)
- California Reports, Third Series (Cal.3d) (3108)
- California Appellate, Fifth Series (Cal.App.5th) (2813)
- California Reports, Fourth Series (Cal.4th) (2598)
Latest documents
- In re Jaylen W., 041621 CAAPP1, A160693
- People v. Jones, 041621 CAAPP2, B301935
- People v. Rodriguez, 041621 CAAPP5, F080904
- People v. Del Cid, 041621 CAAPP2, B302145
- Stein v. Black Diamond Supplements, LLC, 041621 CAAPP2, B308482
- People v. Scrivens, 041621 CAAPP3, C081371
- People v. Guzman, 041621 CAAPP3, C087841
- People v. Perkins, 041621 CAAPP2, B306121
- In re Adrian H., 041621 CAAPP4-1, D077906
- People v. Flannery, 041621 CAAPP3, C069945
Featured documents
- 8 Cal.5th 548, S029843, People v. Beck
- 4 Cal.5th 903, S222732, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (Charles Lee)
At issue was what standard applies in determining whether workers should be classified as employees or as independent contract for purposes of California wage orders. Two drivers filed this purported class action alleging that Dynamex Operations West, Inc. had misclassified its delivery drivers as ...
- 63 Cal.4th 665, S216681, People v. Sanchez
- 46 Cal.4th 1053, S024833A, People v. Farley
- 24 Cal.4th 317, S062201, Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.
- 38 Cal.4th 72, S042698, People v. Jurado
- 2 Cal.5th 945, S224086, McGill v. Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff opened a credit card account with Defendant Citibank, N.A. and purchased a credit protector plan. Defendant later amended the original agreement by adding an arbitration provision. The provision waived the right to seek public injunctive relief in any forum. The arbitration provision...
- 23 Cal.4th 978, S013187, People v. Kraft
- 56 Cal.4th 203, S181004, Harris v. City of Santa Monica
- 53 Cal.4th 891, S064733, People v. Abel