Myers v. City of Centerville, Ohio
| Docket Number | 21-3850 |
| Decision Date | 21 July 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Ballard v. Cope
...violated his clearly established rights by sufficiently alleging the elements of those claims. See Myers v. City of Centerville, Ohio, 41 F.4th 746, 766 (6th Cir. 2022) (finding that “whether a speechretaliation claim is clearly established at the pleadings stage rises and falls with whethe......
-
Blick v. Ann Arbor Pub. Sch. Dist.
...pending an investigation into embezzlement-is a dispute arising from “potential wrongdoing or [the] breach of the public trust.” Myers, 41 F.4th at 761 (quoting Brandenburg, 253 F.3d at 898). As such, the “focus, point, or communicative purpose” of the restricted speech is a matter of publi......
-
Gruber v. Bruce
...elements one and two - that is, the adverse action was motivated at least in part by his protected conduct. Myers v. City of Centerville, 41 F.4th 746, 759 (6th Cir. 2022); Bennett v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 977 F.3d 530, 537 (6th Cir. 2020). Dr. Bruce insists that Plain......
-
Kirkland v. City of Maryville, Tennessee
...and political retribution by an elected official, falls safely within those quintessential categories. Myers v. City of Centerville , 41 F.4th 746, 761–62 (6th Cir. 2022). It may be, as the City contends, that the post was merely the latest episode in Kirkland's "long contentious personal h......
Request a trial to view additional results