United States Trust Co. v. Roche
Citation | 22 N.E. 265,116 N.Y. 120 |
Parties | UNITED STATES TRUST CO. v. ROCHE et al. |
Decision Date | 08 October 1889 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals |
Appeal from supreme court, general term, first department.
On the 10th day of November, 1858, James A. Foster was the owner in fee of an undivided half of five lots,-Nos. 40, 42, and 44 Bond street, and Nos. 43 and 47 Great Jones street, in the city of New York. At that date he, Anna S. Stagg, and Charles H. Town, in consideration of the then intended marriage of said Foster and said Anna S., entered into a tripartite contract under seal, whereby Foster conveyed said undivided half of the real estate to Charles H. Town,
November 17, 1858, said Foster and Anna S. intermarried, and on the same day the marriage settlement was recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the city and county of New York. From 1871 to 1880, inclusive, Charles H. Town was the agent for the owner of the half of said real estate not held by him under trust, and he omitted to pay the taxes assessed on the whole property during those years, and also omitted to pay the water-rates assessed thereon in 1870, 1871, 1872, 1875, and 1876, which taxes and water-rates amounted, inclusive of interest, to $19,382.97, one-half of which ($9,691.48) was equitably chargeable to each moiety of said property. In July, 188§, the city advertised that the whole property would be sold for the purpose of collecting said arrears, and thereupon said trustee, James A. Foster, and Anna S. jointly petitioned the supreme court for leave to borrow sufficient money on mortgage to pay said arrears, interest, and expenses, together with the expenses of obtaining the loan. At this date James A. Foster and Anna S. had two infant children, for whom a guardian ad litem was appointed to take charge of their interests in the matter of said petition. A reference was ordered to ascertain and report the facts, and, on the coming in of the report, an order was entered September 9, 1881, granting the prayer of the petition, and directing that a mortgage be given for an amount sufficient to pay the following sums:
+-----------------------------------------------------+ ¦For the services of the attorneys for the ¦ ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦petitioners ¦$ 400 00 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦For their disbursements ¦42 97 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦For the services of the guardian ad litem ¦200 00 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦For the principal sum due the city for ¦ ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦taxes and water-rates ¦9,691 48 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦For interest on $9,691.48, and expenses of¦ ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦advertising ¦3,836 88 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦For the charges of Trust Co. for ¦ ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦examining title ¦297 25 ¦ +------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦Total ¦$14,468 58¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+
On the 5th of October, 1881, the plaintiff loaned $14,450, taking the bond of the trustee conditioned for the payment of the sum, November 1, 1884, with interest at 5 per cent., payable semi-annually, and, as collateral thereto, said trustee, James A. Foster, and Anna S. Foster executed a mortgage upon the trust-estate, conditioned for the payment of said sum, as provided in the bond. July 2, 1883, the trustee having resigned his trust, Theodore M. Roche was, pursuant to the provision of the marriage settlement above quoted, appointed trustee in his stead, and entered upon the discharge of his duties. No part of the sum secured by the bond and mortgage has been paid, except the interest to November 1, 1884; and March 5, 1885, this action was begun to foreclose the mortgage. James C. Foster, the only surviving child of James A. and Anna S. Foster, is of full age, resides in the city of New York, but is not a party to this action. Theodore M. Roche, (the trustee,) James A. Foster, Anna S. Foster, and Clinton and Margaret Foster, the owners of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Underwood
......C. Underwood, trustee of John E. Higgins Estate Trust, Harry Devine, Jr., the Town of. Glenrock, and William Burgess, County ... the question of taxation. The will states that the annuity is. payable out of the income. Counsel for Devine seek ... Trusts it is stated: "The United States or a state has. capacity to take and hold property in trust, but ...Gaither, 66. Md. 171, 7 A. 243, 251; United States Trust Co. v. Roche, 116 N.Y. 120, 22 N.E. 265; Rutherford v. Larned, 102 Ga. 50, 28 S.E. ......
-
Share v. Coats
...of questions of fact to the jury should specifically point out the matters it is desired to have submitted. Mayer v. Dean, 115 N. Y. 556, 22 N. E. 265, 5 L. R. A. 540. Such a request will not be granted after the rendition of the directed verdict. Persons v. Hawkins, 41 App. Div. 171, 58 N.......
-
Share v. Coats
...... Appeal from circuit court of Brown county. The complaint states two causes of action. The first for the recovery of $1 per acre commission ......
-
Perkins v. Burlington Land & Improvement Co.
...Lord Clinton, 2 Jac. & W. 1, 133. See, also, Biscoe v. Perkins, 1 Ves. & B. 485; Collier v. Walters, L. R. 17 Eq. 252; Trust Co. v. Roche, 116 N. Y. 120, 22 N. E. 265;Campbell v. Watson, 8 Ohio, 498;Baylor's Lessee v. Dejarnette, 13 Grat. 152. Thus it is held in Georgia that “when the perso......