123X Corp. v. McKenzie
| Decision Date | 24 May 2004 |
| Docket Number | 2003-03195. |
| Parties | 123X CORP., Respondent, v. BEVERLY A. McKENZIE et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to "restore" this action after it had been marked inactive due to the parties' failure to appear at a status conference. CPLR 3404 does not apply to this pre-note of issue action (see Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190 [2001]), there was no 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, and there was no order dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27. Accordingly, the motion was properly granted (see Lucious v Rutland Nursing Home of Kingsbrook Jewish Med. Ctr., 2 AD3d 412 [2003]; Gendus v Sheraton/Atl. City W., 302 AD2d 427 [2003]; Torres v Nu-Way Mach. Corp. Co., 296 AD2d 545 [2002]; Farley v Danaher Corp., 295 AD2d 559 [2002]).
The defendants' remaining contention is without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rakha v. Pinnacle Bus Servs.
...662;Casavecchia v. Mizrahi, 62 A.D.3d 741, 742, 877 N.Y.S.2d 906;Burdick v. Marcus, 17 A.D.3d 388, 792 N.Y.S.2d 356;123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 A.D.3d 769, 776 N.Y.S.2d 893;Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 A.D.2d at 191, 725 N.Y.S.2d 57). The defendants' remaining contentions are without......
-
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mehrnia
...Inc. v. Gibson, 111 A.D.3d 875, 976 N.Y.S.2d 142 ; Varricchio v. Sterling, 86 A.D.3d at 535, 926 N.Y.S.2d 320 ; 123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 A.D.3d 769, 776 N.Y.S.2d 893 ).Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiff's unopposed motion to restore (see Bank of N.Y. ......
-
Tolmasova v. Umarova
...Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc., 23 A.D.3d 510, 511, 806 N.Y.S.2d 633; Burdick v. Marcus, 17 A.D.3d 388, 792 N.Y.S.2d 356; 123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 A.D.3d 769, 776 N.Y.S.2d 893). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the appellant's cross application to dismiss the action pu......
-
Transtechnology Corp. v. Assessor
...related proceedings to active status was automatic upon Transtechnology's motion to restore ( see generally 123X Corp. v. McKenzie, 7 A.D.3d 769, 770, 776 N.Y.S.2d 893). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of Transtechnology's motion which were to restore the71 A.......