Lawrence v. State

Citation124 So.3d 91
Decision Date24 October 2013
Docket NumberNo. 2011–KA–01887–COA.,2011–KA–01887–COA.
PartiesSpencer O'Brian LAWRENCE a/k/a Spencer Lawrence a/k/a Spencer O. Lawrence, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

George T. Holmes, Jackson, attorney for appellant.

Office of the Attorney General by Laura Hogan Tedder, attorney for appellee.

Before LEE, C.J., FAIR and JAMES, JJ.

FAIR, J., for the Court:

¶ 1. Spencer Lawrence was convicted in the Jackson County Circuit Court of capital murder for the death of Jermaine Kelly. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On appeal, Lawrence raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court should have suppressed evidence gathered from Lawrence's cell phone and Lawrence's statements made to one of the police officers; (2) whether Lawrence's rifle and photographs of the rifle were more prejudicial than probative; (3) whether Lawrence was denied a fair trial based on comments made in the State's closing argument; and (4) whether the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. On October 4, 2009, Kelly was at his father's house in Moss Point, Mississippi, with his cousin, Donta Davenport. Kelly was supposed to pick up his father from the hospital the following day. During the early morning hours of October 5, 2009, two armed men entered the home, and Kelly was shot seven times in the chest. Kelly died immediately. Officers arrived around 5:45 a.m. to discover Kelly's body in a room that had been ransacked. The officers also found a cell phone in the backyard.

¶ 3. Davenport testified that he fell asleep on the couch and was awakened by two men kicking in the back door. He saw two men enter the home, one with a handgun and the other with an SKS or AK–47 “assault rifle.” Both men demanded money from Davenport and Kelly. Davenport complied, handing the men all of his money. He then ran out of the house as the two men assaulted Kelly. Davenport testified that, as he was running out of the house, he heard several gunshots. Davenport ran towards Magnolia Street and was chased by a dark-colored sports utility vehicle (SUV). He escaped and talked to the police later that day. Davenport stated that the man holding the rifle was taller than the man holding the handgun.

¶ 4. Agent Louie Miller of the Pascagoula Police Department was called in to assist in the homicide investigation. Agent Miller obtained a search warrant for the cell phone found in the backyard and traced it to Jermaine Sims. Agent Miller also discovered that Sims owned a dark-colored SUV. Lawrence and Myron Johnson became suspects when an inmate from the Perry County jail contacted the FBI regarding a conversation he recently had with Lawrence. During his interview, the inmate provided specific details of the crime, including who was involved and what each person took from the scene. The inmate stated that Lawrence admitted to shooting Kelly with a rifle.

¶ 5. Agent Miller informed the George County Sheriff's Department to be on the lookout for a dark SUV. On November 25, 2009, Lawrence was arrested without a warrant in George County. He was driving a dark-colored Jeep Cherokee. At the time of his arrest, Lawrence was out on bond on charges of kidnaping and armed robbery. Lawrence was subsequently held in George County on a contempt-of-court warrant. The police seized Lawrence's cell phone and found that the phone number was one of the phone numbers listed in Sims's cell-phone records from the night of the homicide. Through additional search warrants, Agent Miller obtained phone records for Lawrence and Johnson. The records obtained from Lawrence's phone contained a photo of an AK–47. Further investigation revealed that the photo of the gun was taken in Lawrence's bedroom. The gun was later brought to the police by Lawrence's mother.

¶ 6. Agent Miller interviewed Lawrence on three different occasions: on the day of the arrest, on November 30, 2009, and on December 2, 2009. Lawrence was Mirandized 1 each time he was questioned. On the day of his arrest, Lawrence denied being involved in the crime. He later changed his story to say that he was with Sims and Johnson the night Kelly was shot. However, Lawrence stated that he remained in the car during the incident. His testimony at trial was the same as his interview. He denied any participation in the robbery and the shooting of Kelly.

¶ 7. At trial, the State called Martin Joe, who testified to Lawrence's involvement in the murder of Kelly. Joe, an inmate incarcerated in George County, had been placed in a cell with Lawrence in January 2010. Joe stated that Lawrence told him that, on the night of Kelly's murder, he, Sims, and Johnson were going to Moss Point to rob Kelly.

¶ 8. The State also called Johnson, who testified to the following: on the night of the shooting, he rode with Sims and Lawrence from Mobile, Alabama, to Moss Point to buy marijuana. On their way to Moss Point, the men picked up Johnson's cousin, James Johnson. Johnson testified that Sims and Lawrence went into the house first, and when he entered he saw Lawrence pointing a long gun at Kelly. Johnson also stated that, after he saw the guns, he rushed back to the SUV, and his cousin jumped into the front seat to drive. As they were trying to leave, Lawrence and Sims jumped into the vehicle. From there, the four men went to James Johnson's house, dropped James off, and then drove back to Mobile. Johnson stated that, at some point during the night, he and Sims both lost their cell phones. Johnson also testified that after he was arrested, he was incarcerated in the same detention center as Lawrence, and during that time, Lawrence admitted to shooting Kelly.

¶ 9. At the close of trial, the jury returned a verdict finding Lawrence guilty of capital murder. Lawrence was sentenced to life imprisonment in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections without the possibility of parole.

DISCUSSION

1. Motion to Suppress
A. Invalid Stop

¶ 10. Lawrence argues for the first time on appeal that the stop was invalid. The trial court denied Lawrence's motion to suppress, and that motion never challenged the stop of the vehicle, but, rather, the validity of his arrest. “An objection at trial on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds.” Spicer v. State, 921 So.2d 292, 305 (¶ 22) (Miss.2006) (citing Doss v. State, 709 So.2d 369, 379 (Miss.1996)). Therefore, Lawrence is procedurally barred from raising this issue on appeal.

¶ 11. Notwithstanding the procedural bar, Lawrence's argument is without merit. “Police officers may detain a person for a brief, investigatory stop consistent with the Fourth Amendment when the officers have ‘reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific and articulable facts' that allows the officers to conclude the suspect is wanted in connection with criminal behavior.” Eaddy v. State, 63 So.3d 1209, 1213 (¶ 14) (Miss.2011) (quoting Walker v. State, 881 So.2d 820, 826 (¶ 10) (Miss.2004)). Grounds for reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop generally come from an officer's observation or an informant's tip. Id. at (¶ 15). “An informant's tip may provide reasonable suspicion if accompanied by some indication of reliability,” including an “officer's independent investigation of the informant's information.” Id. (citation omitted); see also McClellan v. State, 34 So.3d 548, 552 (¶¶ 9–10) (Miss.2010) (finding a valid investigatory stop where officers made the stop after obtaining “somewhat vague” information from an informant). In determining whether there is reasonable suspicion or probable cause for an investigatory stop, our review is de novo. Eaddy, 63 So.3d at 1212 (¶ 11).

¶ 12. Lawrence first became a suspect after an inmate from the Perry County jail contacted the FBI. The inmate gave Agent Miller a description of the crime based on his conversation with Lawrence. The inmate was able to specify the amount of money and drugs stolen during the robbery. Agent Miller stated that he and his officers found the inmate's testimony to be credible and reliable based on its consistency with the evidence. Based on this information, the officers were looking for a black vehicle that belonged to Sims.

¶ 13. Officer Robert Lambeth of the Moss Point Police Department testified that on November 25, 2009, he received a phone call from an officer in George County about a vehicle matching Sims's dark SUV. He went to George County and saw that Lawrence was in possession of Sims's SUV. After Lawrence was arrested, the vehicle was inventoried, and a search warrant was obtained for the vehicle and Lawrence's cell-phone records. Whether reasonable suspicion exists is a matter judged from the totality of the circumstances. Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 328–29, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990). We conclude that, based on the totality of the circumstances, the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop Lawrence. Therefore, his argument that the stop was invalid is without merit.

B. Delay of Appearance

¶ 14. Lawrence was arrested on November 25, 2009. He did not have an appearance until five days later. Lawrence argues that the confession obtained during the interim was a result of his delayed hearing, which is cause for reversible error. We disagree.

¶ 15. Uniform Rule of Circuit and County Court Practice 6.03 states that [e]very person in custody shall be taken, without unnecessary delay and within 48 hours of arrest, before a judicial officer or other person authorized by statute for an initial appearance.” Our supreme court has stated, however, that [a] violation of Rule 6.03 alone will not result in the suppression of evidence or reversible error where the defendant was informed of his rights and made a knowing and voluntary waiver.” Jones v. State, 841 So.2d 115, 132 (¶ 47) (Miss.2003). The record reveals ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Woods v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 2015
    ... ... He neither filed a motion to suppress nor otherwise objected to any evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds. Nor does he claim on appeal that the evidence was admitted in plain error. So the only issue he raises on appeal is procedurally barred. See Lawrence v. State, 124 So.3d 91, 95 ( 10) (Miss.Ct.App.2013). 11. But even without the bar, his lack-of-probable-cause argument lacks merit, because there was no Fourth Amendment violation warranting suppression.I. ProbableCause Requirement 12. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and ... ...
  • Cameron v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 2015
    ...Amendment grounds. And he has not argued any evidence was admitted in plain error. So this issue is procedurally barred. See Lawrence v. State, 124 So.3d 91, 94–95 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App.2013). Aside from this bar, Cameron's lack-of-probable-cause argument fails because there was no Fourth Ame......
  • Motley v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 15, 2016
    ...that Motley owned a gun like that used by one of the robbers." Although there is no Maryland case directly on point, Lawrence v. State, 124 So. 3d 91 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013), a Mississippi appellate decision, not only addresses the very issue before us—that is, the admissibility of photograph......
  • Hynes v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • December 2, 2014
    ...and articulable facts[,] that allows the officers to conclude the suspect is wanted in connection with criminal behavior.”Lawrence v. State, 124 So.3d 91, 95 ( ¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App.2013).¶ 12. Under Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996), the United States......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT