Abbott v. Fisher
Decision Date | 03 May 1878 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | John S. Abbott v. Alfred G. Fisher & another |
[Syllabus Material]
Suffolk. Contract against Alfred G. Fisher and Sarah L Allwright, on a promissory note for $ 300, dated August 14 1876, signed by the defendant Fisher, payable to his own order and indorsed by him and the other defendant. Answer, want of consideration. Trial in the Superior Court, before Rockwell, J., who ordered a verdict for the defendants, and reported the case, for the consideration of this court, in substance as follows:
On May 12, 1875, the plaintiff and Fisher were duly chosen assignees of the estate of Horace L. Duncklee, who had previously been adjudged a bankrupt by the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; on the same day the choice was approved and confirmed, and they accepted that trust. The plaintiff offered to prove the following facts:
Prior to July, 1876, about $ 3000 had been received by Fisher from the assets of said estate, but, though he had frequently assured the plaintiff that the money should be deposited in their joint names, as assignees, no part of it had been deposited; and on July 7, 1876, the plaintiff presented to the judge of the District Court the following petition, signed by him:
This petition was referred to a register in bankruptcy acting in the cause, to hear the parties and make such order as he deemed proper, and to see that such order was carried out.
On July 11, 1876, the register appointed July 13, 1876, at noon, as the time for hearing on the petition, and issued an order of notice to Fisher, which was duly served. At the request of Fisher, postponements were had, and, after sundry interviews by the plaintiff with the defendant Allwright's attorney, on September 1, 1876, the plaintiff received from such attorney seven promissory notes amounting in all to $ 2400, and delivered to him for Allwright a paper writing, signed by the plaintiff, which, after acknowledging the receipt of the notes, proceeded as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gorringe v. Read
... ... v. Carry (Md.), 24 A. 152; Wolf v. Froxell, ... 94 Mich. 573; Miller v. Lumber Co., 98 Mich. 163; ... Papple v. Day, 123 Mass. 520; Abbott v ... Fisher, 124 Mass. 414; Cohoes v. Cropsey, 55 ... N.Y. 685; Ford v. Crotty, 52 Ill. 313; Taylor v ... Cottrell, 16 Ill. 93; Von ... ...
-
Hayes v. Hall
...determined to be wrongful, they would not be chargeable at common law with the loss incurred. Ames v. Armstrong, 106 Mass. 15; Abbott v. Fisher, 124 Mass. 414, 417; Brice Stokes, 11 Ves. 314. We cannot, however, properly assume in favor of the contestants as the master leaves the case--that......
-
McKim v. Aulbach
...v. Plymouth, 1 Dickens 120; Bacon v. Bacon, 5 Ves. 331; Powell v. Evans, 5 Ves. 839, 843; Towne v. Ammidown, 20 Pick. 535; Abbott v. Fisher, 124 Mass. 414; Gaultney v. Nolan, 33 Miss. 569; Williams Maitland, 1 Ired. Eq. 92, 106; Perry v. Maxwell, 2 Dev. Eq. 488; Whitted v. Webb, 2 Dev. & Ba......
- Turner v. Atwood