In re Equitable Reserved Fund Life Ass'n of City of New York
Decision Date | 01 March 1892 |
Citation | 30 N.E. 114,131 N.Y. 354 |
Parties | In re EQUITABLE RESERVED FUND LIFE ASS'N OF CITY OF NEW YORK. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from supreme court, general term, first department.
Petition of the receiver of the Equitable Reserved Fund Life Association of the City of New York in regard to the distribution of the funds in his hands. The special term entered judgment upon the report of a referee, which judgment was reversed by the general term. Modified.
Lucius McAdam, Samuel H. Benton, Geo. C. Holt, and C. R. Minrath, for appellants.
Henry C. De Witt, Artemus B. Smith, R. J. Moses, and Henry H. Whitman, for respondent.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by PECKHAM, J.:
This association was incorporated on the 17th day of May, 1883, under and by virtue of chapter 175 of the Laws of 1883, passed April 2d of that year, and entitled
‘An act to provide for the incorporation and regulation of co-operative or assessment life and casualty insurance associations and societies.’ This act was amended by chapter 285 of the Laws of 1887. The corporation has been dissolved, and a receiver appointed to distribute its funds among those entitled thereto. Disputes have arisen as to the respective rights of parties claiming an interest in the funds in the hands of the receiver of the dissolved corporation, the chief question being as to the proper application of the two funds called the ‘Death Fund’ and the ‘Reserve Fund.’ The company adopted a constitution and a set of by-laws, and used a form of certificate of membership under which people became insured. It continued business from the time of its incorporation until the 18th of September, 1889, when, upon the application of the attorney general, a temporary receiver was appointed, and the officers of the company enjoined from meddling with its funds. The receiver remained in charge of the company under this appointment until the 9th of November, 1889, when the company was formally dissolved, and a decree to that effect duly entered, and the temporary was appointed the permanent receiver to distribute the effects of the company among those entitled thereto. The company was dissolved on the ground that it had been conducting its business fraudulently, which, by the thirteenth section of the act of 1883, as amended by the act of 1887, was made a ground for dissolving a corporation formed under such acts, upon application of the attorney general. The association had no capital stock, and its only means of paying its expenses and the claims against it arose from admission fees, annual dues, and assessments. It is in respect to the moneys collected from assessments that the principal questions here arise. The constitution stated that the object of the association was ‘to advance the welfare of its members, and to provide pecuniary indemnity upon a member's decease, to his family or others dependent upon him, or to such other person or persons as shall have been duly designated by him.’ Article 1, § 2. All persons becoming members were required to ‘comply with and be subject to all the requirements for membership set forth in the constitution, by-laws, and certificate of membership.’ Article 2. The agency and general expenses of the business of the company were provided for by the admission fees and annual dues from members, and such fees and dues were to be graded according to the amount of benefit called for, and were to be prescribed in the certificate. Article 8. The following sections from different articles of the constitution have been specially alluded to and urged as material in the various arguments of counsel. Section 1 of article 6 is as follows:
By-laws were adopted, but they are not deemed of importance with regard to the questions raised and decided herein.
When the company first commenced to do business it made assessments whenever a death occurred, and the funds were collected for the payment of the special claim arising from each death loss. The assessment was for the particular death. On the 12th of March, 1889, the constitution was amended in that particular so as to read as set forth in the first section of article 7, and without reference to any particular death. Each member took his certificate, paid his assessments, and continued his membership with reference to the recognized power of the company at the proper time and in the regular was to amend its constitution and by-laws. The following are the material provisions of the certificate issued by the company to the parties it insured: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Federico Macaroni Mfg. Co. v. Great Western Fire Ins. Co.
... ... American Surety Company of New York, as surety. The condition ... or obligation of ... life contracts after insolvency, but before ... 154 N.Y. 95, 47 N.E. 968; In re Equitable Reserved Fund ... Life Association, 131 N.Y ... German-American Insurance Company. The city court of Macon ... rendered a judgment of ... ...
-
Moran v. Franklin Life Ins. Company
...Law 867; 3 Ency. of Law 1059 et seq.; 3 Ency. of Law 1081 et seq.; 1 Joyce on Sus., sec. 188; Sulz v. Mut. Res., 145 N.Y. 563; In re Equitable Assn., 131 N.Y. 354; Sup. L. Knight, 117 Ind. 489; Haas v. Mut. Relief, 118 Cal. 8; May v. Soc., 13 N. Y. St. 66; Sunival v. Dubuque, 18 Iowa 319; S......
-
Page v. Marcel
...43 N.J.Eq. 522, 11 A. 739; People v. Commercial Alliance Life Insurance Co., 154 N.Y. 95, 47 N.E. 968; In re Equitable Reserved Fund Life Association 131 N.Y. 354, 30 N.E. 114; People ex rel. Attorney General v. Life & Reserve Association, 150 N.Y. 94, 45 N.E. 8; Commonwealth ex rel. [Kirkp......
-
City of Bridgeport v. ÆTna Indem. Co.
...appointment. Attorney General v. Ins. Ass'n, 175 Mass. 196, 55 N. E. 890; Dean & Sons' Appeal, 98 Pa. 101; In re Equitable Reserve Fund Ass'n, 131 N. Y. 354, 30 N. E. 114; People v. Life Ins. Co., 154 N. Y. 95, 47 N. E. 968; People v. Metropolitan Surety Co., 205 N. Y. 135, 98 N. E. 412, An......