Bradford v. Brinley

Decision Date22 September 1887
Citation145 Mass. 81,13 N.E. 1
PartiesBRADFORD and another, Trustees v. BRINLEY and others.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Bill in equity by the trustees under the will of Samuel Dexter Bradford, praying for instructions as to the construction of the will. Hearing in the supreme judicial court for Suffolk county, before HOLMES, J., who reserved the case for the consideration of the full court, upon the following facts:

Samuel Dexter Bradford died on January 12, 1873, leaving a will under which the plaintiffs are trustees. By article 1 of said will the testator, except as otherwise provided in the subsequent articles thereof, gave to his wife, Rebecca, one of the defendants, the use, benefit, and enjoyment, during life, of all property of every name and nature of which the testator should die seized, possessed, or entitled to, at law or in equity, or of which he could by his father's will or by any instrument, dispose of or direct the use or other disposition of, by his last will or otherwise; and directed and appointed that said Rebecca receive and enjoy, during her life, the income of all property devised and bequeathed by his father's will for the benefit of himself, his family or any other person, whereof he, by his father's will, or any instrument, could dispose or direct the use, ownership or other disposition of the income, not included in the foregoing gift to her of a life-estate or interest therein. And, in case any subsequent gift or direction in the will should fail, he gave the use or income of all property in respect to which the gift or direction should so fail to his said wife for life. By article 2, and the codicil to his will, he gave to his wife, in fee and absolutely, his dwelling-house, and all adjacent land at Newport Rhode Island, and all his personal property, and all debts, demands, and securities and rights belonging to him, except those held in trust under the will of his father. Articles 3, 4, and 5 of said will of the testator were as follows:

"Art. 3. Whereas, by the terms of my father's will, certain property, real and personal, including his homestead at West Roxbury, Massachusetts, is bequeathed and devised, to be held in trust or otherwise, for the benefit of my mother, during her life-time, and one-half of the same, or of the proceeds thereof, may be disposed of by me, subject to her interest therein or the trusts for her benefit, I do therefore order, direct, and appoint that, if my said wife is living at the time of my mother's death, she shall have the use, benefit, and enjoyment of that part of said property which is thus liable to be disposed of by me, or of the income thereof, if my power extends no further than to dispose of the income, till the eldest of my children, who survives me, attains his majority. When that event happens, if she is still living, my executors are directed to set apart out of the said property a fund for the benefit of said child, consisting of money or securities, or partly of money and partly of securities, to the amount or value of $100,000. When my second child, who survives me, attains his or her majority, my said executors are directed to set apart, for his or her benefit, a similar fund of $100,000; and so on in succession, as each child attains his or her majority, until a fund of the amount or value of $100,000 has been set apart for each of my children who attains majority. My said wife shall continue to have the use, benefit, and enjoyment of the remainder of the property, or of the income of such remainder, as the case may be, as each successive fund is set apart, (and of the remainder after all the funds are set apart,) during her life-time as aforesaid. And I order, direct, and appoint that, at any time after my mother's death, my said wife may give to any of my children, or to any issue of such child, absolutely and indefeasibly, any part of the capital of the property mentioned in this or in the first article of this will, except such portion thereof as may have been set apart to constitute any of the funds mentioned in this article, or which it is necessary to retain in order to constitute all of said funds. And every division to be afterwards made, as hereinafter provided, shall be made without reference to such gift, the residue only being divided.

"Art. 4. Immediately after the death of my said wife, my surviving executors are directed to divide all the estate and property mentioned in any part of this will, except that mentioned in the second article thereof, into as many shares as I shall leave children me surviving, who have also survived till their mother's death, or who have died and left issue surviving at that time. If my mother dies before my wife, any of the funds which have been set apart, as provided in the third article of this will, shall be accounted a part of the share to which the child, or the issue of the child for whom it was set apart, would be entitled at my wife's death; but it shall not again be divided as part of the estate mentioned in this article. If, on the other hand, my wife dies before my mother, the division provided for in this article shall be made without reference to the property bequeathed and devised by my father for my mother's benefit, as stated in the foregoing third article; and, after my mother's death, that portion of said property which is subject to my disposition, as therein stated, shall be divided into as many shares as I shall leave children me surviving, who have also survived till their grandmother's death, or who have died and left issue surviving at that time. And, in order to enable them the better to make the division or divisions herein provided for, and to discharge their powers and duties under this will, I hereby bequeath and devise to said executors, and the survivor or survivors of them, in trust for the purposes herein mentioned, all the property mentioned in this will, except in the second article thereof, subject to the life-estates and interests of my said wife and mother respectively.

"Art. 5. Every fund or share to be created or set apart, as hereinbefore provided for, shall be equal in value or amount, in executor's judgment, to every other fund or share to be created or set apart at the same time. Every fund or share created or set apart for the benefit of the issue of a deceased child shall be immediately paid, delivered, or transferred to such issue. Every fund or share created or set apart for the benefit of a child who is then living shall be held and managed by executors, during the life-time of that child, in trust to invest and reinvest the same, and to pay over the clear income thereof, deducting expenses, to that child, as the same accrues, and not otherwise; the anticipation of any such income being hereby expressly prohibited. At his or her death, leaving surviving issue, such issue shall take absolutely the capital and unexpended income of such fund or share. But, if such child leaves no surviving issue, he or she may dispose of the capital and unexpended income by a last will and testament, but not otherwise. In default of any such disposition, such capital and unexpended income, or the part thereof not disposed of, shall be equally divided between my other children then surviving and the surviving issue of those who may be dead; such issue to take the share to which the parent would have been entitled if living."

The remaining articles and the codicil (except as referred to above) are not material to the decision in the case. Mrs. Julia E. Bradford, the mother of the testator, died August 15, 1886, and the three defendants, children of the testator, are all the children he ever had, and are all over 21 years of age. All property received and held by the plaintiffs as trustees under the testator's will, is personal property, and amounts only to the sum of $389,101.43, and all property held by them under article 3 of the will amounts to the sum of $125,000, and no more, and constitutes a part of the above-named sum of $389,101.43. The real estate in West Roxbury, mentioned and referred to in article 3 of the will, was conveyed by the testator in fee to his mother, Julia Emma Bradford, long prior to the date of said will and codicil, and the real estate mentioned and referred to in article 2 of the will, situate at Newport, Rhode Island, was conveyed by the testator long prior to the date of the will, to Arthur W. Austin, in trust for the creditors of said testator, and for other purposes.

The bill set forth that conflicting claims were made upon the plaintiffs, respecting the legacies given to the several children of the testator under article 3 of the will, upon attaining the age of 21 years, and the death of the testator's mother; each of the above-named defendants Mary Josephine Kissel, Samuel Dexter Bradford, and Julia Emma Bradford, children of the testator, and Godfrey Kissel, husband of the said Mary Josephine, claiming and insisting that, notwithstanding the funds held by the plaintiffs as trustees under article 3 of the will amounted to but $125,000, they should each have forth with set out for them separately, to be held under the provisions of the will, a fund of $100,000, to be made up from said fund of $125,000, under article 3 of the will, and so much as might be necessary from the remainder of the trust-estate held by the plaintiffs, and in which the defendant Rebecca M. Brinley, and her husband, Edward H. Brinley, claim that she has a life-estate or the income of; while the mother, the said defendant Rebecca M. Brinley, and her husband, Edward H. Brinley, both claimed that, under said article 3, each of the defendants, children of the testator, said Mary Josephine Kissel, Samuel Dexter Bradford, and Julia Emma Bradford...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT