Dimmitt v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co.
Decision Date | 09 March 1891 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | DIMMITT et al. v. KANSAS CITY, ST. J. & C. B. R. Co. |
Appeal from circuit court, Buchanan county; JOSEPH P. GRUBB, Judge.
Strong & Mosman, for appellant. Ramey & Brown, for respondent.
This case is certified here from the Kansas City court of appeals as one involving a constitutional question. The material averments of the petition are that the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant, at the city of St. Joseph, in the state of Missouri, one box in good order, containing 6,000 cigars, of the value of $315, marked and consigned to one J. McAleer at the city of Deadwood, in the territory of Dakota, to be carried and delivered to said consignee at said Deadwood according to said marks and directions; that said defendant then and there received said box of cigars for the purpose aforesaid, and issued to plaintiff the following receipt or bill of lading: "Received, St. Joseph, Mo., 6-10, 1881, from J. W. Dimmitt & Co., in apparent good order, by the K. C., St. Jo & C. B. Railroad Company, the following articles marked as below, which are to be delivered without unnecessary delay in like good order, at Omaha station, to consignee or owner, or to such company or carriers as per marks and directions in margin, subject to its charter, freight regulations, and agreements. In witness whereof, the agent of said railroad hath affirmed the three bills of lading, all of this tenor and date, one of which being accomplished, the others to stand void.
============================================================= MARKS AND CONSIGNEES. NO. PKS. ARTICLES. WEIGHT ------------------------------------------------------------- J. W. McAleer, Box Cigars Deadwood, D. T. 1 strapped, 200." via Ft. Pierre. corded and Acct. Dougherty & Co. sealed -------------------------------------------------------------
— That the defendant carried said box to Omaha, and delivered the same to the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad Company, which company carelessly and negligently failed to deliver said box to said Dougherty & Co., whereby said cigars became worthless and were totally lost to plaintiffs. The answer of the defendant was a general denial. The case was tried by the court without a jury upon the following agreed statement of facts: ` ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nenno v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Ry. Co.
...Mo.App. 282; Orr v. Railroad, 21 Mo.App. 333; Snider v. Adams Express Co., 63 Mo. 376; Coates v. U. S. Express Co., 45 Mo. 238; Dimmit v. Railroad, 103 Mo. 433. (2) Section R. S. 1899, has no application to this case or to the questions raised by this appeal. That statute refers and applies......
-
Crockett v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Company
... ... 369] West ... Shore Railroad Company at New York for transportation to ... Kansas City, Missouri, under a contract made with said ... company, which agreed to carry only to the end ... matter in what form the bill of lading was issued. The ... construction began with Dimmitt v. Railroad, 103 Mo ... 433, 15 S.W. 761, was retained in a modified form in ... McCann v ... ...
-
Eckles v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
... ... [87 S.W. 100] ... Appeal ... from St. Louis City Circuit Court.--Hon. Franklin Ferriss, ... AFFIRMED ... Pacific should be delivered to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa ... Fe at Kansas City, the through rate from Kansas City to Los ... Angeles being $ 1.75 per hundred pounds. On ... Nines v ... Railway, 107 Mo. 457, 18 S.W. 26; Dimmitt v ... Railway, 103 Mo. 433, 15 S.W. 761; Grain Co. v ... Railway, 138 Mo. 668, 40 S.W. 894; ... ...
-
Crockett v. St. Louis & H. Ry. Co.
...to a point beyond its own line, no matter in what form the bill of lading was issued. The construction began with Dimmitt v. Railroad, 103 Mo. 433, 15 S. W. 761, was retained in a modified form in McCann v. Eddy, 133 Mo. 59, 33 S. W. 71, 35 L. R. A. 110, and, right or wrong, is beyond the p......