City Trade and Industries, Limited v. Allahabad Bank, Limited
Decision Date | 16 June 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 42029,No. 1,42029,1 |
Parties | CITY TRADE & INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. ALLAHABAD BANK, LTD., et al |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Allahabad Bank, Ltd., and The Bank of Baroda, Ltd., instituted in the Superior Court of Chatham County an attachment proceeding in which it was deposed that City Trade & Industries, Ltd., was indebted to them in attachment in the sum of $370,766.20 and that said defendant was selling or conveying its property liable for the payment of its debts for the purpose of avoiding the payment of the debt and that the defendant resided out of the State of Georgia. The affidavit contained no description of the property to be levied upon. The attachment directed to the sheriff or his deputy, etc., directed the seizure of 'all that jute or jute backing cloth stored at the Garden City Terminals of the Georgia State Ports Authority as will make the amount of the alleged debt to plaintiff, and to serve such summons of garnishment as might be placed in the hands of said officers and to make return to the December term, 1964, of the Superior Court of Chatham County. The attachment was signed by Judge Edwin A. McWhorter, Senior Judge of the Superior Court of the Eastern Judicial District. A deputy sheriff made the following return on the attachment: The plaintiff filed the following declaration in attachment: 'Now come Allahabad Bank, Limited and Bank of Baroda, Limited, plaintiffs in attachment, and in accordance with Section 8-601, et seq., of the law of Georgia, state the following: 1. The property, that is jute, of defendant, City Trade & Industries, Ltd., is subject to the jurisdiction of this court because the property is located within Chatham County, Georgia, to wit: at the Garden City Terminals of the Georgia State Ports Authority. Further, City Trade & Industries, Ltd.: (a) is selling or conveying its property liable for the payment of its debts for the purpose of avoiding payment of a debt due the plaintiffs, and (b) said debtor resides out of the State of Georgia, both of which are grounds for an attachment. 2. City Trade & Industries, Ltd. is indebted to the Allahabad Bank, Limited, in the amount of $343,915.26 together with interest at 6% from the respective maturity dates plus protest fees on a series of negotiable trade acceptances. A list of the bills and their individual amounts is set out as Exhibit 'A'. Copies of the bills are attached hereto as Exhibits 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', and 'K'. 3. City Trade & Industries, Ltd. is indebted to The Bank of Baroda, Limited, in the amount of $26,850.94 together with interest at 6% from their respective maturity dates plus protest fees on a series of negotiable trade acceptances. A list of the bills and their individual amounts is set out as Exhibit 'B', and attached hereto. Copies of the bills are attached hereto as Exhibits 'L', 'M' and The declaration was amended to include other trade acceptances. It was also amended to include as a plaintiff in attachment, the Bank of Tokyo, Ltd., and to show the amount of indebtedness to the three plaintiffs to be $540,138.51. The last amendment to the declaration is as follows: 'Third Amendment to Declaration in Attachment Now come the Allahabad Bank, Limited, the Bank of Baroda, Limited and the Bank of Tokyo, Ltd., plaintiffs in attachment, and with leave of court, amend their declaration in attachment as follows: 1. By adding the following sentence after the first sentence in paragraph 1 of the declaration, to wit: 2. By adding the following additional sentence after the word 'authority.' in the first sentence in paragraph 1 of the declaration, to wit: 3. Amend the prayer of the declaration to conform to the exhibits attached herewith by inserting the following language after the word 'hands': The agreement to release the jute to James Talcott, Inc., is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
James Talcott, Inc. v. Allahabad Bank, Ltd.
...and was selling the property liable for the payment of the drafts to avoid payment of its debt. City Trade & Industries v. Allahabad Bank, Ltd. et al., 114 Ga.App. 12, 150 S.E.2d 182 (1966). During the pendency of these attachment proceedings, the price of jute sky-rocketed, so all the part......