Granchelli v. Travelers Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 16 November 1990 |
| Citation | 167 A.D.2d 839,561 N.Y.S.2d 944 |
| Parties | E.A. GRANCHELLI, Palace Theater Centennial Development Ltd., and Velco, Inc., Appellants, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Schaus & Schaus by Robert Schaus, Buffalo, for appellants.
Farrell & Quackenbush by H. Ward Hamlin, Jr., Buffalo, for respondent.
Before DENMAN, J.P., and BOOMER, PINE, BALIO and LAWTON, JJ.
In February 1985, plaintiff sustained water damage to his real property resulting in a loss of approximately $116,000, and commenced this action when defendant insurer denied coverage on the ground that plaintiff's loss was not a direct loss within the meaning of its policy. According to plaintiff, a windstorm blew open a roof door, and subzero air entered the building, causing a pipe to freeze and thereafter to burst, resulting in the water damage. The policy at issue insured against direct loss "by * * * (2) windstorm or hail; [and] (3) explosion, excluding loss * * * (b) by rupture or bursting of * * * (ii) water pipes." In granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, the court found that, while the windstorm was a link in the chain of events leading up to the loss, it was too remote to be deemed the direct cause of the loss. We disagree.
Direct loss is equivalent to proximate cause (see, 18 Couch 2d on Insurance, § 74:712, at 1022; Annotation, What Constitutes "Direct Loss" Under Windstorm Insurance Coverage, 65 ALR3d 1128), and we find that the burst water pipe could have been proximately caused by the windstorm (see, Lipshultz v. General Ins. Co. of Am., 256 Minn. 7, 96 N.W.2d 880; see also, Federal Ins. Co. v. Bock, 382 S.W.2d 305 [Tex]; Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Central Mut. Ins. Co., 235 F.Supp. 540 [D.Or.]. Furthermore, the policy exclusion of loss by the bursting of water pipes applies only to explosions (see, Lipshultz v. General Ins. Co. of Am., supra; cf., Williams v. Liberty Mut. Life Ins. Co., 334 Mass. 499, 135 N.E.2d 910; Abady v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co., 266 F.2d 334 Mass. 499, 362).
Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kula v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.
... ... Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 75 N.Y.2d 747, 749, 551 N.Y.S.2d 891, 551 N.E.2d 92). State Farm bears the burden of ... Co., [212 A.D.2d 21] 80 N.Y.2d 1008, 1011, 592 N.Y.S.2d 657, 607 N.E.2d 804; Granchelli v. Travelers Ins. Co., 167 A.D.2d 839, 561 N.Y.S.2d 944). Furthermore, the principles of ... ...
-
N.H. Ins. Co. v. MF Global Fin. USA Inc.
...Dept. 1996] [using proximate cause as test for determining whether insurance loss was a direct loss]; Granchelli v. Travelers Ins. Co. , 167 A.D.2d 839, 839 [561 N.Y.S.2d 944] [4th Dept. 1990] ["Direct loss is equivalent to proximate cause"]; see generally Tonkin v. California Ins. Co. of S......
-
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. MF Global, Inc.
...Dept. 1996] [using proximate cause as test for determining whether insurance loss was a direct loss]; Granchelli v. Travelers Ins. Co., 167 A.D.2d 839, 839, 561 N.Y.S.2d 944 [4th Dept. 1990] [“Direct loss is equivalent to proximate cause”]; see generally Tonkin v. California Ins. Co. of San......
-
FLORISTS'MUT. INS. CO. v. Tatterson
... ... relied on cases from West Virginia and New York which held that the term "direct loss" should be interpreted to mean proximate loss, Granchelli v. Travelers Insurance Co., 167 A.D.2d 839, 561 N.Y.S.2d 944 (1990); La Bris v. Western National Insurance Co., 133 W.Va. 731, 59 S.E.2d 236, 240 ... ...
-
Indirect or Consequential Loss Exclusion: Coming Of Age.
...with proximate cause (Sorrentino v. Allcity Insurance Co., 229 A.D.2d 481, 645 N.Y.S.2d 515; E.A. Granchelli v. Travelers Insurance Co., 167 A.D.2d 839, 561 N.Y.S.2d 944). The distinction in the nature of the losses is critical for our purposes. Those terms of the fidelity bonds do not desc......