Lee v. Hector Supply Co.
Decision Date | 04 October 1938 |
Citation | 133 Fla. 849,183 So. 489 |
Parties | LEE v. HECTOR SUPPLY CO. et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
On rehearing.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for further action in accordance with prior opinion as modified.
For former opinion, see 182 So. 613. Appeal from Circuit Court, Leon County; J. B. Johnson, Judge.
Cary D Landis, Atty. Gen., and H. E. Carter and W. P. Allen, Asst Attys. Gen., and J. Velma Keen and A. Frank O'Kelley Jr., both of Tallahassee, for appellants.
C. L Waller and B. A. Meginniss, both of Tallahassee, and Evans, Mershon & Sawyer and M. L. Mershon, all of Miami, and Herbert S. Sawyer and W. O. Mehrtens, both of Miami, for appellees.
C. J. Holland, of Miami, as amicus curiae.
Pursuant to the granting of rehearing, we have considered additional brief filed herein and have also heard arguments by able counsel for the respective parties.
Since our former opinion was filed, there has been brought to our attention the case of McCarroll, Commissioner v. Scott Paper Box Co. et al., 195 Ark. 1105, 115 S.W.2d 839. That case is in harmony with the view expressed by Mr Justice Buford and concurred in by Mr. Justice Terrell in the opinion filed July 6th, 1938, 182 So. 613, 617, saying:
And with the further view so expressed:
'When a customer comes into one of the plaintiff's stores and purchases paper wraps, wooden shipping containers, paste for the application of labels, box strappings, crate materials and hampers, for the purpose of using the materials purchased for packing and shipping fruit and vegetables, by wrapping the fruit or vegetables with the paper wraps, placing the wrapped fruit or vegetables in the assembled wooden shipping containers, crates or hampers, applying the paste to make secure on the outside of the container the labels showing the variety, grade and brand of fruit or vegetables to be found in the container, and attaching the box strappings to securely fasten the container so that it will carry the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dorsett v. Overstreet
...186, 97 So. 307; Myers v. City of Miami, 100 Fla. 1537, 131 So. 375; Blalock v. Powledge, 131 Fla. 498, 179 So. 772; Lee v. Hector Supply Co., 133 Fla 849, 183 So. 489. --------- ...
-
Air Jamaica, Ltd. v. State, Dept. of Revenue
...therein, are purchased for re-sale where the cost of such containers affects and adds to the price of the product. Lee v. Hector Supply Co., 133 Fla. 849, 183 So. 489 (vegetable crates) (omitting additional The purpose of exempting from a retail sales tax such intermediate sales of containe......
-
Bentley-gray Dry Goods Co. v. City of Tampa
... ... in question controls interstate business but applies ... exclusively to intrastate business transacted here.' See ... also Lee v. Hector Supply Co. et al., 133 Fla. 849, ... 183 So. 489 ... The ... fifth question challenges the reasonableness of the tax ... imposed. It is ... ...
-
L. A. Frey and Sons v. Lafayette Parish School Bd.
...Molasses Co. of New York v. McGoldrick, 256 App.Div. 649, 11 N.Y.S.2d 289; Id., 281 N.Y. 269, 22 N.E.2d 369, and Lee v. Hector Supply Co., 133 Fla. 849, 183 So. 489, contain elaborate discussions of analogous situations. While the language and the arguments used differ as well as the circum......