Best v. Garris
Decision Date | 17 March 1937 |
Docket Number | 233. |
Parties | BEST v. GARRIS et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Wayne County; Clawson L. Williams Judge.
Action by W. H. Best, Jr., administrator of T. H. Garris, deceased against Ralph Garris and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
This is a petition to sell certain lands for assets to pay indebtedness amounting to some $480 brought by plaintiff against defendants.
There are five tracts sought to be sold. The value of the land is about $2,000. The defendants set up the plea practically of sole seizin and ask that the prayer of petitioner be denied. In the record is the following: "Both parties plaintiff and defendants having expressly waived trial by jury in open Court, and agreed that the Court may hear the evidence, find the facts and render judgment thereon in or out of term, in or out of the District."
The court below found the facts and based its conclusions of law thereon, and rendered the following judgment:
The defendants made the following exception and assignment of error and appealed to the Supreme Court: "Exception No. 1-is to the rendering, signing and entry of the judgment for that it is contrary to the law in the case insofar as it holds that: (a) Title to the first four tracts described in plaintiff's petition remained in Ransom Garris at the date of his death in 1922, and passed by descent to his heirs, and that T. H. Garris took an undivided interest therein and was owner of said interest at his death in fee, and that (b) Possession of said T. H. Garris, under the deeds, Exhibits A and B, was not such as to ripen title under color, or perfect title in said T. H. Garris and that the petitioner is entitled to have the said undivided interest of T. H. Garris in the said lands sold and proceeds applied to the discharge of the indebtedness due by his estate."
E. A. & Ambrose Humphrey, of Goldsboro, for appellants.
J. Faison Thomson, of Goldsboro, for appellee.
N.C.Code 1935 (Michie), § 568, is as follows:
Section 570 relates to exceptions to decisions of court.
Nowhere in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St. George v. Hanson
...error No. 7 to the signing of the judgment presents the sole question as to whether the facts found support the judgment. Best v. Garris, 211 N.C. 305, 190 S.E. 221; Swink v. Horn, 226 N.C. 713, 40 S.E.2d 353; Cannon v. Blair, 229 N.C. 606, 50 S.E.2d The judge is only required to find and s......
-
Cannon v. Blair
... ... sell and convey any or all of the real estate, either at ... private sale or public auction, as may to them seem best to ... the interest of the estate,' and are directed to close ... the trust 'as of December 31, 1954, by turning over to ... David H. Blair, Jr., ... appeal, in the absence of exceptions that they are not ... supported by evidence. Best v. Garris, 211 N.C. 305, ... 190 S.E. 221; Buchanan v. Clark, 164 N.C. 56, 80 ... S.E. 424. Although it is questionable whether such position ... can be ... ...
-
Swink v. Horn
... ... Morganton Mfg. & Trading Co. v. Foy-Seawell Lumber Co., ... 178 N.C. 571, 101 S.E. 214; Best" v. Garris, 211 N.C ... 305, 190 S.E. 221; In re Escoffery, 216 N.C. 19, 3 ... S.E.2d 425; Jones v. Griggs, 219 N.C. 700, 14 S.E.2d ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Fish v. Hanson
... ... involved, the value of the assets was down, and it was agreed ... between the parties interested that, since it was not to the ... best interest of the estate to immediately close the same, as ... time passed, and income of the estate and sums realized from ... the liquidation of ... v ... Cooke, 204 N.C. 566, 169 S.E. 148; Buchanan v ... Clark, 164 N.C. 56, 80 S.E. 424; Best v ... Garris, 211 N.C. 305, 190 S.E. 221 ... It is ... apparent that the agreement was to the advantage of all ... parties. Through the ... ...