Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
| Decision Date | 28 April 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-7378,92-7378 |
| Citation | 20 F.3d 614 |
| Parties | Earl Wayne COATS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
James O. Dukes, Bryant, Clark, Dukes, Blakeslee, Ramsay & Hammond, Gulfport, MS, James O.M. Womack, Bernard H. Ticer, Burke & Mayer, New Orleans, LA, for Penrod.
William B. Gibbens, III, Gelpi, Sullivan, Carroll & Gibbens, P.C., New Orleans, LA, for Hytorc, M.E.
Maurice C. Hebert, Jr., David M. Flotte, Hebert, Mouledoux & Bland, New Orleans, LA, for appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 18, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 5 F.3d 877)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
-
Hall v. Environmental Chemical Corp.
...to Mississippi; and returning the plaintiff to Mississippi for medical treatment paid for by the defendant), reh'g granted en banc, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994), relevant part reinstated, 61 F.3d 1113 (5th B. Fair Play and Justice The Court further concludes that the exercise of jurisdiction ......
-
Bertram v. Freeport McMoran, Inc.
...application of joint and several liability to maritime co-defendants in comparative fault system), reh'g en banc ordered, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994). Our review is de As stated, in requiring the 50% reimbursement, the district court relied on Savoie, 627 F.2d 722, 724, which allowed complet......
-
Boy Scouts of America v. Graham, 94-16609
...Corp., 5 F.3d 877, 890 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1303, 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994) reh'g en banc granted, 20 F.3d 614 (1994), opinion reinstated in part, 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir.1995). The district court in this case concluded that Graham failed to satisfy his burden o......