20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994), 92-7378, Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.

Docket Nº:92-7378.
Citation:20 F.3d 614
Party Name:Earl Wayne COATS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
Case Date:April 28, 1994
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Page 614

20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994)

Earl Wayne COATS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v.

PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants,

Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E.,

Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

No. 92-7378.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

April 28, 1994

James O. Dukes, Bryant, Clark, Dukes, Blakeslee, Ramsay & Hammond, Gulfport, MS, James O.M. Womack, Bernard H. Ticer, Burke & Mayer, New Orleans, LA, for Penrod.

Page 615

William B. Gibbens, III, Gelpi, Sullivan, Carroll & Gibbens, P.C., New Orleans, LA, for Hytorc, M.E.

Maurice C. Hebert, Jr., David M. Flotte, Hebert, Mouledoux & Bland, New Orleans, LA, for appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion October 18, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 5 F.3d 877)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP
12 practice notes
  • Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co., 110708 IWNDC, 06-CV-99-LRR
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit
    • 7 Noviembre 2008
    ...by a stenographer as well as a videographer). But see Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp ., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir. 1993), reh'g en banc granted , 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994), opinion reinstated in part , 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995) (fees of a video technician are not recoverable as costs under Fe......
  • 876 P.2d 352 (Or.App. 1994), CA A80715, Horn v. Seacatcher Fisheries, CA A80715, Inc.
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • 22 Junio 1994
    ...v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir.1993), cert. den. 510 U.S. 1195, 114 S.Ct. 1303, 127 L.Ed.2d 654, reh'g en banc granted 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994) (foreign corporation that recruited employees in Mississippi was subject to suit in Mississippi by Mississippi resident employee w......
  • 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995), 92-7378, Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    • 8 Agosto 1995
    ...v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1303, 127 L.Ed.2d 654, reh'g en banc granted, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994), and only those portions necessary to the issues discussed herein are Maritime Industrial Services is a corporation organized ......
  • 64 F.Supp.2d 638 (S.D.Tex. 1999), Civ. A. G-99-262, Hall v. Environmental Chemical Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 5th Circuit Southern District of Texas
    • 13 Septiembre 1999
    ...back to Mississippi; and returning the plaintiff to Mississippi for medical treatment paid for by the defendant), reh'g granted en banc, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994), relevant part reinstated, 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995). B. Fair Play and Justice The Court further concludes that the exercis......
  • Free signup to view additional results
12 cases
  • Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co., 110708 IWNDC, 06-CV-99-LRR
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 8th Circuit
    • 7 Noviembre 2008
    ...by a stenographer as well as a videographer). But see Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp ., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir. 1993), reh'g en banc granted , 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994), opinion reinstated in part , 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995) (fees of a video technician are not recoverable as costs under Fe......
  • 876 P.2d 352 (Or.App. 1994), CA A80715, Horn v. Seacatcher Fisheries, CA A80715, Inc.
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • 22 Junio 1994
    ...v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir.1993), cert. den. 510 U.S. 1195, 114 S.Ct. 1303, 127 L.Ed.2d 654, reh'g en banc granted 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994) (foreign corporation that recruited employees in Mississippi was subject to suit in Mississippi by Mississippi resident employee w......
  • 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995), 92-7378, Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    • 8 Agosto 1995
    ...v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1303, 127 L.Ed.2d 654, reh'g en banc granted, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1994), and only those portions necessary to the issues discussed herein are Maritime Industrial Services is a corporation organized ......
  • 64 F.Supp.2d 638 (S.D.Tex. 1999), Civ. A. G-99-262, Hall v. Environmental Chemical Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 5th Circuit Southern District of Texas
    • 13 Septiembre 1999
    ...back to Mississippi; and returning the plaintiff to Mississippi for medical treatment paid for by the defendant), reh'g granted en banc, 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994), relevant part reinstated, 61 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1995). B. Fair Play and Justice The Court further concludes that the exercis......
  • Free signup to view additional results