New York Lawyers' Assn. v. Dacey

Decision Date29 December 1967
Parties, 234 N.E.2d 459 In the Matter of the Petition of NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS' ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. Norman F. DACEY, et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 28 A.D.2d 161, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984.

Daniel M. Shientag, New York City, for petitioner respondent.

Arthur Stephen Penn, New York City, for respondents-appellants, Norman F. Dacey and Norman F. Dacey doing business as National Estate Planning Council.

Satterlee, Warfield & Stephens, New York City, for respondents-appellants, Crown Publishers, Inc., Doubleday & Company, Inc. and Brentano's Inc.

Proceeding was brought by New York County Lawyers' Association against author of book entitled 'How to Avoid Probate!', and the publishers, distributors, and sellers of the book pursuant to the Judiciary Law, Consol.Laws, c. 30, § 750, subd. B, to punish them for contempt and for an injunction for the unlawful practice of law.

The Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County, 54 Misc.2d 564, 282 N.Y.S.2d 985, entered a judgment adjudging the author guilty of criminal contempt because of the allegedly unlawful practice of law, fining him, and granting an injunction against him and the publishers, distributors, and sellers of the book.

The Appellate Division, 28 A.D.2d 161, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984, by a divided court, entered an order November 15, 1967 which affirmed the judgment as to the author and modified the judgment, on the law, as to the publishers, distributors, and sellers by limiting injunction granted against the publishers, distributors and sellers so as to restrain from the publication, distribution and sale in New York, and from advertising or soliciting purchases of the book in New York. Stevens, J., dissented, on ground that it could not be claimed that the publication of a legal text which purported to say what the law is amounts to legal practice, and that the mere fact that the principles or rules stated in the text may be accepted by a particular reader as a solution to his problem, does not affect the matter, and that the publication of a multitude of forms for all manner of legal situations is a commonplace activity and their use by the Bar and public is general, and that the conjoining of the text and the forms with advice as to how the forms should be filled out does not constitute the unlawful practice of law, and that the order appealed from should be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • S.E.C. v. Lowe
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 18, 1984
    ... ... Schoeman, Schoeman, Marsh, Updike & Welt, New York City (Elizabeth H. Cooper, David A. Newberg, New York City, of counsel), ... 929, 935-936, 71 L.Ed.2d 64 (1982) (advertising by lawyers). It found, nevertheless, that "the censorship that the SEC would impose ... See New York County Lawyers Association v. Dacey, 21 N.Y.2d 694, 287 N.Y.S.2d 422, 234 N.E.2d 459 rev'g., 28 A.D.2d 161, ... ...
  • State Bar v. Cramer
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • November 1, 1975
    ... ... At the conference the client is advised that defendants are not lawyers, but that they do provide the forms and service which enables one to ... to a group which that night became the Association of the Bar of New York City in an effort to correct the appalling conditions which prevailed ... would be analogous to that set forth in New York County Lawyers Assn. v. Dacey, 21 N.Y.2d 694, 287 N.Y.S.2d 422, 234 N.E.2d 459 (1967), a case ... ...
  • Menin v. Menin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1974
    ... ... of the Fourteenth Amendment and Article 1, section 6 of the New York State Constitution, it is provided that 'no person shall be deprived of ... 366 U.S. 36, 81 S.Ct. 997, 6 L.Ed.2d 105) since 'lawyers also enjoy first-class citizenship' (Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511, 516, ... of N.Y. Co. Lawyers' Assn. v. Dacey, 28 A.D.2d 161, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984, rvd. other gr. 21 N.Y.2d 694, ... ...
  • In re Campanella
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • April 10, 1997
    ... ... kits in all of its places of business in New Jersey and New York" ...          B. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ...      \xC2" ... contended that the official forms were purposefully devised by lawyers to be incomprehensible to lay persons and that the mysteries of the forms ...         In In re New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Dacey, 28 A.D.2d 161, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984, rev'd, 21 N.Y.2d 694, 287 N.Y.S.2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Virtually Unclear: Will Legal Tech Companies Bridge Justice Gap Or Fall Into UPL Abyss?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • August 4, 2015
    ...Assn. v. Dacey, 54 Misc.2d 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1967) affd. in part, modified in part, 28 A.D.2d 161 (1st Dept. 1967), revd. sub nom., 21 N.Y.2d 694 (N.Y. 1967).] The book contained information and forms that readers could use to create wills and trusts without the assistance of an attorney. ......
3 books & journal articles
  • The "watchman for Truth": Professional Licensing and the First Amendment
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 23-03, March 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...of bankruptcy forms not unauthorized practice). 128. 28 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. 1967), reversed and dissenting opinion adopted by 21 N.Y.2d 694 129. See id. at 171-72 (Stevens, J., dissenting). 130. Id. at 174 (Stevens, J., dissenting). 131. Id. at 173 (Stevens, J., dissenting). 132. See supr......
  • When public policies collide: legal "self-help" software and the unauthorized practice of law.
    • United States
    • Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal Vol. 27 No. 1, March 2001
    • March 22, 2001
    ...County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Dacey, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984, 999, (App. Div. 1967) (Stevens, J., dissenting), rev'd and dissenting opinion adopted, 287 N.Y.S.2d 422, 234 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1967) ("Every individual has a right to represent himself if he chooses to do so, and to assume the risks attendant......
  • Changes in the role and the form of the trust at the new millennium, or, we don't have to think of England anymore.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 62 No. 2, December 1998
    • December 22, 1998
    ...each). Organized bar associations fought the Dacey trust many years ago, and lost. See, e.g., New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Dacey, 234 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1967) (reversing an order finding Norman Dacey guilty of the unauthorized practice of law because of his book on how to avoid probate).......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT