National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Cambria Clay Products Co.

Decision Date12 August 1955
Docket NumberNo. 12072.,12072.
PartiesNATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CAMBRIA CLAY PRODUCTS COMPANY, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

George J. Bott, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Miller, Searl & Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.

Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the National Labor Relations Board that the Court reconsider its order of April 5, 1955 sustaining respondent's motion of February 24, 1955, together with its suggestion for en banc reconsideration, having been considered by the Court;

And the Court being of the opinion that the uniform procedure heretofore followed by the Court should not be departed from, namely, that in cases where the appeal was heard, and the judgment or order complained of was decided, by a regular Court consisting of three judges only, a petition to rehear or to reconsider should not be considered by the Court en banc;

It Is Ordered that said motion to reconsider is overruled. Sec. 160(e), Title 29, U.S.C.A.; Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 334 U.S. 62, 68 S.Ct. 972, 92 L.Ed. 1212; N. L. R. B. v. National Gas Co., 8 Cir., 215 F.2d 160; Compare: Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co., 309 U.S. 23, 60 S.Ct. 416, 84 L.Ed. 558, rehearing denied, 309 U.S. 695, 60 S.Ct. 585, 84 L.Ed. 1035; Schilder v. Gusik, 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 662, 664.

Judge McALLISTER is of the opinion that the motion to reconsider should be granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • NLRB v. Hartmann Luggage Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 29 de dezembro de 1971
    ...Co. v. NLRB, 374 F.2d 606, 608 (10th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. Cambria Clay Products Co., 215 F.2d 48, 54 (6th Cir. 1954), rehearing denied, 229 F.2d 433 (1955); Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472, 479 (3d Cir. 1939), modified, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940). With these princi......
  • Fernandez v. Flint Board of Education
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 2 de dezembro de 1960
    ...case is without merit. The Extraordinary Motion for a Rehearing on the Merits, En Banc, etc. is denied. National Labor Relations Board v. Cambria Clay Products Co., 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 433 and Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Glenn L. Martin Co., 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 434, 50 A.L.R.2d ...
  • Minder v. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, 12502.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 19 de dezembro de 1955
  • National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, 13209
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 25 de fevereiro de 1958
    ...of appeals, consisting of three judges only, a petition to rehear will not be considered by the court en banc. N. L. R. B. v. Cambria Clay Products Co., 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 433; Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Glenn L. Martin Co., 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 434, 50 A.L.R.2d In accordance with the foregoing ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT