Allanwilde Transport Corporation v. Vacuum Oil Co Same v. Pidwell the Allanwilde
Decision Date | 13 January 1919 |
Docket Number | 450,Nos. 449,s. 449 |
Citation | 39 S.Ct. 147,3 A. L. R. 15,248 U.S. 377,63 L.Ed. 312 |
Parties | ALLANWILDE TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. VACUUM OIL CO. SAME v. PIDWELL. THE ALLANWILDE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Oscar D. Duncan, Courtland Palmer, and Russell T. Mount, all of New York City, for Allanwilde Corporation.
Mr. John C. Prizer, of New York City, for Vacuum Oil Co. and Pidwell.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 378-381 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.
The questions in the cases arise upon libels filed against the Allanwilde to recover prepaid freight for the transportation of certain goods and merchandise to designated ports in Europe.
The solution of the questions turns upon (1) the asserted prevention of the adventure by a storm at sea which the vessel encountered, requiring her return to port for repairs, and (2) afterwards by the restraining power of the government.
On November 1, 1917, the Allanwilde, owned by the Allanwilde Transport Corporation, was seized upon libels filed by the Vacuum Oil Company and A. W. Pidwell, respectively, each of which had shipped certain goods to be carried from New York to Rochefort, France.
In May, 1917, the Oil Company chartered the vessel to carry a cargo of oil in barrels at the rate of $16.50 a barrel (changed afterwards to $15.25).
The charter party contained inter alia the following provisions:
On August 25, the oil having been loaded, the vessel issued a bill of lading containing inter alia the following provision:
'All conditions and exceptions of charter party are to be considered as embodied in this bill of lading.'
Pidwell was permitted to ship certain kegs of nails on the vessel, and on August 15 a bill of lading was issued to him. Inter alia it provided that the carrier should not be liable for loss, damage, delay or default 'by causes beyond the carrier's reasonable control; * * * by arrest or restraint of governments, princes, rulers, or peoples; * * * by prolongation of the voyage. * * *'
It is provided in paragraph 5 of the bill of lading that:
'Full freight to destination, whether intended to be pre paid or collected at destination, and all advance charges * * * are due and payable to (the Allanwilde Transport Corporation) upon the receipt of the goods by the latter * * * and any payment made * * * in respect of the goods * * * shall be deemed fully earned and due and payable to the carrier at any stage before or after loading of the service hereunder without deduction (if unpaid), or refund in whole or in part (if paid), goods or vessel lost or not lost, or if the voyage be broken up. * * *'
In pursuance of the contracts thus attested the oil and the nails were shipped on the Allanwilde and the freight was paid in advance—$49,745.50 for the oil and $3,128.00 for the nails.
The vessel was seaworthy and properly manned and equipped, and set sail September 11. After she had been out about 14 days and was about 500 miles from New York she encountered a storm so severe that her boats were carried away and she sprang a leak so threatening that the water in her hold was three or four feet deep and was gaining on the pumps. Thereupon the master properly decided that he must seek a port of refuge for safety and repair. Halifax was about 500 miles away, but in that direction the wind was against him, while it was favorable for New York, and on this account as well as for other good reasons he headed for New York, where he arrived on October 5, having been out 24 days. Repairs were undertaken at once, the cargo remaining on board meanwhile.
Upon these facts the Circuit Court of Appeals have certified four questions, two in each libel, as follows:
'1. Was the adventure frustrated, and was the contract evidenced by the charter party and by the bill of lading issued to the Oil Company...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Home Ins. Co. of New York v. MERCHANTS'TRANSP. CO.
...L. Ed. 90; De Lovio v. Boit, 7 Fed. Cas. 418, No. 3,776; The John Francis (D. C.) 184 F. 746; Allanwilde Trans. Corp. v. Vacuum Oil Co., 248 U. S. 377, 39 S. Ct. 147, 63 L. Ed. 312, 3 A. L. R. 15; International Paper Co. v. The Gracie D. Chambers, 248 U. S. 387, 39 S. Ct. 149, 63 L. Ed. 318......
-
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Ill. Commerce Comm'n
... ... , Caterpillar, Inc.; Daimler Chrysler Corporation; CITGO Petroleum Corporation; Corn Products ... If we were deciding this issue in a vacuum, we might agree with ComEd. However, in this ... See ... Cassens Transport Co. v. Industrial Comm'n, 218 Ill.2d 519, 524, ... do not vary with end use; they are the same for any consumer of electricity. The Commission ... ...
-
Venezuelan Meat Export Co. v. United States
...the bill of lading remain effective and that petitioner may not recover the freight money. Allanwilde Transport Corp. v. Vacuum Oil Co., 248 U. S. 377, 39 S. Ct. 147, 63 L. Ed. 312, 3 A. L. R. 15. "But for all damages legally attributable to the breach of warranty of seaworthiness petitione......
-
Black & Yates, Inc. v. Negros-Philippine Lumber Company
...of performance are not in point; the delay was of greater duration than contemplated by the parties and terminated the contract; Allanwilde Co. v. Oil Co., supra; where performance becomes impossible because of an of war involving a nation of which one of the parties is a citizen or subject......