2500 Motel Corp. v. Investors Ins. Co. of America

Decision Date29 January 1991
Citation564 N.Y.S.2d 750,169 A.D.2d 604
Parties2500 MOTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent, NAB Associates et al., Defendants-Respondents, Olga Delgado et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Before KUPFERMAN, J.P., and CARRO, ELLERIN and SMITH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert E. White, J.), entered on or about September 6, 1989, inter alia, declaring that defendant Investors Insurance Company of America ("Investors") is obligated to defend and "if necessary" indemnify plaintiff and defendants NAB Associates ("NAB") and Joseph M. Satlow ("Satlow"), unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of declaring that Investors is obligated to defend and indemnify its insured unless the alleged injuries in the underlying action were caused by an assault or battery committed by or at the direction of its insured or an employee or agent of its insured and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff operates Bronx Park Motel under a lease from the owner, NAB. Satlow is a partner in NAB. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that Investors is obligated, under the terms of a policy of insurance, to defend and indemnify it in a negligence action. Upon stipulation of the parties the IAS court permitted an amendment of the complaint to include NAB and Satlow as additional insureds. In the negligence action, defendants Olga Delgado ("Delgado") and Gabriel Vargas ("Vargas") allege that on October 13, 1983, while they were guests at the motel, they were the victims of rape, assault and robbery when, as a result of defective door locks and inadequate security, an intruder entered their room.

The policy provides indemnity for bodily injury or property damage caused by an "occurrence" which is defined as an "accident". An endorsement to the policy states that an "assault and/or battery shall not be deemed an accident." Unlike the IAS court, we read this exclusion to apply to intentional damage caused by or at the direction of the insured, its agents or employees, rather than assaults or batteries committed by unrelated third persons. Had Investors intended to preclude indemnification for damage upon the motel premises caused by criminal acts of a third party, it should have done so "in clear and unmistakable" language. Kratzenstein v. The Western...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mount Vernon Fire Ins. v. Creative Housing
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 30, 1992
    ...agent. This seems to be a valid distinction under New York law as shown by defendants' leading case, 2500 Motel Corp. v. Investors Ins. Co., 169 A.D.2d 604, 564 N.Y.S.2d 750 (1st Dept.1991), leave to appeal denied, 78 N.Y.2d 857, 574 N.Y.S.2d 939, 580 N.E.2d 411 (1992). That case discussed ......
  • Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n of Massachusetts v. Hermitage Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1995
    ...it is not, see, e.g., Mount Vernon Fire Ins. v. Creative Hous. Ltd., 797 F.Supp. 176 (E.D.N.Y.1992); 2500 Motel Corp. v. Investors Ins. Co., 169 A.D.2d 604, 605, 564 N.Y.S.2d 750 (1991). See also Sphere Drake Ins. Co. v. P.B.L. Entertainment, Inc., 30 F.3d 21, 22-23 (2d Cir.1994) (holding, ......
  • Agoado Realty Corp. v. United Intern. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 30, 1999
    ...the insured." There is no exclusion for assault, either in the definition of "occurrence" (compare, 2500 Motel Corp. v. Investors Ins. Co. of America, 169 A.D.2d 604, 605, 564 N.Y.S.2d 750, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 857, 574 N.Y.S.2d 939, 580 N.E.2d 411) or in the list of "Exclusions" set forth ......
  • Bagley v. Monticello Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • Massachusetts Superior Court
    • October 16, 1998
    ... ... restaurant and motel, Bagley and Harper consumed alcoholic ... Allstate ... Ins. Co. v. Diamant, 401 Mass. 654, 656 (1988) ... injury offenses. Ledbetter v. Concord Gen. Corp., ... 665 So.2d 1166, 1169 (La. 1996). Thus, ... (internal quotations omitted), quoting 2500 Motel Corp., ... supra at 605; see also Sphere ... Research and Treatment Center, Rape in America: A ... Report to the Nation (Apr. 23, 1993) ... supra at 456-57; 2500 Motel Corp. v. Investors Ins ... Co., 169 A.D.2d 604, 605, 564 N.Y.S.2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT