Sachse v. Tampa Music Co., 71--564
Decision Date | 10 May 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 71--564,71--564 |
Citation | 262 So.2d 17 |
Parties | Jeanne K. SACHSE, a minor, by her mother and next friend, Claire Sachse, and Claire Sachse, individually, Appellants, v. TAMPA MUSIC CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, and Arthur Smith Music Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Karl O. Koepke, of Whitaker & Koepke and Associates, Orlando, for appellants.
Douglas J. Loeffler of Fox, Burton, George & Loeffler, Clearwater, for appellee Tampa Music Co., Inc.
This appeal is from a final judgment dismissing appellants' Sixth Amended Complaint with prejudice as to Appellee-Defendant Tampa Music Co., Inc. The complaint was also dismissed as to the other defendant, Arthur Smith Music Company, the subject of a companion appeal, 262 So.2d 39.
Appellants alleged that while appellant Jeanne K. Sachse was a student at the University of South Florida her eardrums were seriously injured while playing an electric piano, sold by Arthur Smith Music Company in 1963 to the University of South Florida for the use of its students.
Allegations material to this appeal appear in Count VI. Count VII attempted to allege concurring negligence of Arthur Smith Music Company and Tampa Music Co., and since the complaint was dismissed as to Arthur Smith Music Company, this count was properly dismissed.
The pertinent portions of Count VI read as follows:
eardrums and hearing; that such damage forms reasonable negligence if the piano was not reasonably serviced, maintained or repaired by said Defendant.
27. That during the year of 1967, the Defendant serviced said piano on January 19, April 25, July 26, and November 6; and during 1968, the Defendant serviced said piano on January 25, 1968, as per the above alleged service contract and thereby had a duty to the Plaintiff to reasonably inspect and test said piano. That the defect above-mentioned existed on the date of service and had the Defendant properly inspected and tested said piano, the defect would have been discovered; that the Defendant had a duty to warn the minor Plaintiff and other potential users of the said electric...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Glen Garron, LLC v. Buchwald, Case No. 5D15–2279
...may plead with greater certainty." Amiker v. Mid–Century Ins. Co. , 398 So.2d 974, 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (citing Sachse v. Tampa Music Co. , 262 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972) ). Rule 1.130 does not require attachment of the entire contract, but only the attachment or the incorporation into ......
-
Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-4 v. Meyer
...may plead with greater certainty." Amiker v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., 398 So.2d 974, 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (citing Sachse v. Tampa Music Co., 262 So.2d 17, 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972) ). "A complaint based on a written instrument does not state a cause of action until the instrument or an adequate......
-
Butler v. Saunders
...the pleader's possession or control, as alleged here, such failure to attach should not be fatal to the cause." Sachse v. Tampa Music Co., 262 So.2d 17, 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). Butler states in her Complaint that she does not have a copy of the 1998 trust instrument. (Doc. # 2 at ¶ 13). Ther......
-
Hawkins v. Washington Shores Sav. Bank
...Application System, Inc. v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co., 381 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See also Sachse v. Tampa Music Co., 262 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1972) and Padgett v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Santa Rosa County, 378 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (any......
-
Contract cases
...2006). 6. Deanna Const. Co., Inc. v. Sarasota Entertainment Corp ., 563 So.2d 150, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). 7. Sachse v. Tampa Music, Co., 262 So.2d 17, 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972), reversed and remanded following remand , 289 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) (citing Gallichio v. Corporate Group Servi......