Advisory Opinion to Governor, In re, 43434

Decision Date03 April 1973
Docket NumberNo. 43434,43434
Citation276 So.2d 25
PartiesIn re ADVISORY OPINION TO the GOVERNOR.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Edgar M. Dunn, Jr., Gen. Counsel, and Robert T. Mounts, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for Governor Reubin O'D. Askew.

Talbot D'Alemberte, Miami, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Honorable Reubin O'D. Askew

Governor of Florida

The Capitol

Tallahassee, Florida 32304

Dear Governor:

We have the honor to acknowledge your communication of February 26, 1973, requesting our opinion upon a question affecting your executive powers and duties as authorized by Section 1(c) of Article IV, Florida Constitution (F.S.A.).

Omitting the formal parts, your letter reads as follows:

'It is my constitutional duty to fill by appointment vacancies in judicial office. Section 11 of Article V (Revised) of the Florida Constitution, 1968 Revision, provides:

'(a) The governor shall fill each vacancy in judicial office by appointing for a term ending on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January of the year following the next primary and general election, one of not fewer than three persons nominated by the appropriate judicial nominating commission. An election shall be held to fill that judicial office for the term of the office beginning at the end of the appointed term. The nominations shall be made within thirty days from the occurrence of a vacancy unless the period is extended by the governor for a time not to exceed thirty days. The governor must make the appointment within sixty days after the nominations have been certified to him.

'(b) There shall be a separate judicial nominating commission as provided by general law for the supreme court, each district court of appeal, and each judicial circuit for all trial courts within the circuit.

'In accordance with Section 11(b) above, separate judicial nominating commissions have been established by general law (Chapter 72--404, Laws of Florida; Section 43.29, Florida Statutes, 1972 Supplement, F.S.A.) in conformance with Section 20(c)(5)--(7) of Article V (Revised), which provides as follows:

'(c) (5) Each judicial nominating commission shall be composed of the following:

'a. Three members appointed by the Board of Governors of the Florida Bar from among the Florida Bar members who are actively engaged in the practice of law with offices within the territorial jurisdiction of the affected court, district or circuit;

'b. Three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit appointed by the governor; and

'c. Three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit and who are not members of the bar of Florida, selected and appointed by a majority vote of the other six members of the commission.

'(6) No justice or judge shall be a member of a judicial nominating commission. A member of a judicial nominating commission may hold public office other than judicial office. No member shall be eligible for appointment to state judicial office so long as he is a member of a judicial nominating commission and for a period of two years thereafter. All acts of a judicial nominating commission shall be made with a concurrence of a majority of its members.

'(7) The members of a judicial nominating commission shall serve for a term of four years except the terms of the initial members of the judicial nominating commissions shall expire as follows:

'(a) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1974;

'(b) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1975;

'(c) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1976.

'In accordance with subsection (c)(5) above, it is my constitutional duty to appoint three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit to serve as members of each judicial nominating commission. It is also my constitutional duty to commission each member of the judicial nominating commissions, regardless of the appointing authority. Section 1(a), Article IV, of the Florida Constitution, 1968 Revision, provides in part:

"(a) . . . (The Governor) shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, Commission all officers of the state and counties. . . .' (Emphasis theirs)

'Prior to the effective date of the revised Article V (January 1, 1973), the power to fill by appointment vacancies in judicial office was vested exclusively in the Governor without limitation, pursuant to Section 1(f) of Article IV and Section 14 of the old Article V, of the Florida Constitution; these sections provide:

'(Section 1(f)) When not otherwise provided for in this constitution, the governor shall fill by appointment any vacancy in state or county office for the remainder of the term of an appointive office, and for the remainder of the term of an elective office if less than twenty-eight months, otherwise until the first Tuesday after the first Monday following the next general election.

'(Section 14) Vacancies in office of judge, how filled.--When the office of any judge shall become vacant from any cause, the successor to fill such vacancy shall be appointed or elected only for the unexpired term of the judge whose death, resignation, retirement, or other cause created such vacancy.

'In addition, Section 10, of the old Article V, provided in part:

'. . . (I)n event of vacancy in the office of County Solicitor, Clerk or other officer of the Court of Record in and for Escambia County, Florida, from any cause, the successor to fill such vacancy shall be appointed by the Governor to serve for the unexpired term of such office which has become vacant.

'The two provisions of the old Article V set forth above were adopted, in 1956, as part of the Florida Constitution of 1885. Section 7, Article IV, of the Florida Constitution of 1885, provided as follows:

'Section 7. Vacancies in office; appointments.--When any office, from any cause, shall become vacant, and no mode is provided by this Constitution or by the laws of the State for filling such vacancy, the Governor shall have the power to fill such vacancy by granting a commission for the unexpired term.

'It was apparent to me upon assuming office that the power to fill vacancies in judicial offices by appointment was historically and constitutionally vested in the Governor as an executive function. While the previous constitutional scheme had produced many able and qualified members of the judiciary, it was apparent to all who had studied the method of judicial selection in Florida that improvements in the Florida Constitutional scheme could be made.

'Accordingly, your judicial notice is requested of the fact that by Executive Order Number 71--40A, dated July 23, 1971, I established judicial nominating councils and provided rules for their operation. These councils operated successfully under these rules until the effective date of the revised Article V, and were of material assistance to me in the exercise of the power of appointment. In large part, the experience and membership of the judicial nominating councils have now been carried over to the judicial nominating commissions which have been elevated to constitutional status.

'It has come to my attention that there is some doubt on the part of those serving on the newly established commissions, as to rules governing their operation, because the previous executive order governing the operation of the councils is no longer applicable. There does not appear to be any express provision in the present Florida Constitution directly relating to this question.

'In view of the provisions of the Constitution which I have heretofore related, I am in doubt as to whether I, as Governor, have the authority to prescribe uniform rules governing the operation of the judicial nominating commissions. I have the honor, therefore, to request your written opinion on the following questions:

'(1) Is the function of the judicial nominating commissions an executive function, which cannot be limited by legislative act?

'(2) If the answer to the question above is in the affirmative, does the Governor have the inherent or implied power to establish rules governing the operation of the nominating commissions, consistent with applicable provisions of the Florida Constitution?

'(3) If the answer to question number (1) is in the affirmative, but the answer to question number (2) is in the negative, do the judicial nominating commissions have inherent or implied power to make rules governing their operation, consistent with applicable provisions of the Florida Constitution?

'(4) If the answer to question number (3) is in the affirmative, is there any requirement that the rules be uniform throughout the state?'

In answering the first question, we should first review the history of Fla.Const. Art. V, § 11, F.S.A.

In the deliberations of the Florida Constitutional Revision Commission, it was proposed that judicial nominating commissions be created to screen applicants for judicial appointments within their respective juristions and to nominate the three best qualified persons to the Governor for his appointment. The commissions were to be an arm of the executive appointive power to supplant, at least in part, the Governor's so-called 'patronage committee' composed of political supporters, to insure that politics would not be the only criteria in the selection of judges, and to increase generally the efficiency of the judicial appointive process. Working Papers, Fla. Const. Rev. Comm., Vol. XI, p. 169, et seq. (Minutes on Amendment No. 164, December 12, 1966).

By Executive Order 71--40A, on July 23, 1971, you established judicial nominating Councils and prescribed rules for their operation. The stated objectives of this action included the premise that only the most qualified,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Carlson v. Wiggins
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Iowa
    • 19 Enero 2011
    ...United States Constitution.17 See Compl. ¶ 61 (citing Richardson v. Koshiba, 693 F.2d 911, 914 (9th Cir.1982); In re Advisory Op. to the Governor, 276 So.2d 25, 29–30 (Fla.1973); and U.S. Const. art. II, § 2); Pls.' PI Br. at 12 (citing Richardson, 693 F.2d at 914 and McMillan v. Svetanoff,......
  • Matheson v. Ferry
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 11 Enero 1982
    ...concluded, "(T)he power of appointment is intrinsically and historically an executive function." The court in In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, Fla., 276 So.2d 25, 29 (1973), went further and asserted, "The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicant......
  • Richardson v. Koshiba
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 1 Diciembre 1982
    ...Rather, these responsibilities indicate that the Commission's functions are executive in nature. 10 Accord In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So.2d 25, 29 (Fla.1973) (function of Florida's judicial nominating commissions was executive in The Commission also argues that as an "arm o......
  • Butterworth v. Caggiano
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 9 Julio 1992
    ...meanings according to the subject matter, but in the framework of contemporary societal needs and structure. In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 276 So.2d 25 (Fla.1973). Can it seriously be argued that the homestead exemption would have been intended to protect the forfeiture of a home when......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Revision 6: Strengthening the duty to provide public education.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 72 No. 9, October 1998
    • 1 Octubre 1998
    ...was to provide for a greater level of protection from governmental intrusion. Id. at 548. (66) In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29 (Fla. 1973). See also Department of Environ. Protection v. Millender, 666 So. 2d 882,886 (Fla 1996) (quoting Plante, 372 So. 2d at (67) Je......
  • Judicial selection in Florida: an executive branch perspective.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 79 No. 1, January 2005
    • 1 Enero 2005
    ...for the legislature in certain egregious cases. See Little, supra note 4, at 27-28, 30-31. (41) In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29(30) (Fla. 1973); Kanner v. Frumkes, 353 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1977); White, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. at (42) In Re Advisory Opinion to......
  • Rethinking judicial nominating commissions: independence, accountability, and public support.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 34 No. 1, January 2007
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...does not make the appointment within sixty days of receipt of the nominations). (53.) Cf., e.g., In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29-30 (Fla. 1973) ("The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicants which results in the nomination of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT