Advisory Opinion to Governor, In re, 43434
Decision Date | 03 April 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 43434,43434 |
Citation | 276 So.2d 25 |
Parties | In re ADVISORY OPINION TO the GOVERNOR. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Edgar M. Dunn, Jr., Gen. Counsel, and Robert T. Mounts, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for Governor Reubin O'D. Askew.
Talbot D'Alemberte, Miami, as amicus curiae.
Honorable Reubin O'D. Askew
The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32304
Dear Governor:
We have the honor to acknowledge your communication of February 26, 1973, requesting our opinion upon a question affecting your executive powers and duties as authorized by Section 1(c) of Article IV, Florida Constitution (F.S.A.).
Omitting the formal parts, your letter reads as follows:
'It is my constitutional duty to fill by appointment vacancies in judicial office. Section 11 of Article V (Revised) of the Florida Constitution, 1968 Revision, provides:
'(a) The governor shall fill each vacancy in judicial office by appointing for a term ending on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January of the year following the next primary and general election, one of not fewer than three persons nominated by the appropriate judicial nominating commission. An election shall be held to fill that judicial office for the term of the office beginning at the end of the appointed term. The nominations shall be made within thirty days from the occurrence of a vacancy unless the period is extended by the governor for a time not to exceed thirty days. The governor must make the appointment within sixty days after the nominations have been certified to him.
'(b) There shall be a separate judicial nominating commission as provided by general law for the supreme court, each district court of appeal, and each judicial circuit for all trial courts within the circuit.
'In accordance with Section 11(b) above, separate judicial nominating commissions have been established by general law (Chapter 72--404, Laws of Florida; Section 43.29, Florida Statutes, 1972 Supplement, F.S.A.) in conformance with Section 20(c)(5)--(7) of Article V (Revised), which provides as follows:
'(c) (5) Each judicial nominating commission shall be composed of the following:
'a. Three members appointed by the Board of Governors of the Florida Bar from among the Florida Bar members who are actively engaged in the practice of law with offices within the territorial jurisdiction of the affected court, district or circuit;
'b. Three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit appointed by the governor; and
'c. Three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit and who are not members of the bar of Florida, selected and appointed by a majority vote of the other six members of the commission.
'(6) No justice or judge shall be a member of a judicial nominating commission. A member of a judicial nominating commission may hold public office other than judicial office. No member shall be eligible for appointment to state judicial office so long as he is a member of a judicial nominating commission and for a period of two years thereafter. All acts of a judicial nominating commission shall be made with a concurrence of a majority of its members.
'(7) The members of a judicial nominating commission shall serve for a term of four years except the terms of the initial members of the judicial nominating commissions shall expire as follows:
'(a) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1974;
'(b) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1975;
'(c) The terms of one member of category a.b. and c. in subsection (c)(5) hereof shall expire on July 1, 1976.
'In accordance with subsection (c)(5) above, it is my constitutional duty to appoint three electors who reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the court or circuit to serve as members of each judicial nominating commission. It is also my constitutional duty to commission each member of the judicial nominating commissions, regardless of the appointing authority. Section 1(a), Article IV, of the Florida Constitution, 1968 Revision, provides in part:
"(a) . . . (The Governor) shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, Commission all officers of the state and counties. . . .' (Emphasis theirs)
'Prior to the effective date of the revised Article V (January 1, 1973), the power to fill by appointment vacancies in judicial office was vested exclusively in the Governor without limitation, pursuant to Section 1(f) of Article IV and Section 14 of the old Article V, of the Florida Constitution; these sections provide:
'(Section 1(f)) When not otherwise provided for in this constitution, the governor shall fill by appointment any vacancy in state or county office for the remainder of the term of an appointive office, and for the remainder of the term of an elective office if less than twenty-eight months, otherwise until the first Tuesday after the first Monday following the next general election.
'(Section 14) Vacancies in office of judge, how filled.--When the office of any judge shall become vacant from any cause, the successor to fill such vacancy shall be appointed or elected only for the unexpired term of the judge whose death, resignation, retirement, or other cause created such vacancy.
'In addition, Section 10, of the old Article V, provided in part:
'. . . (I)n event of vacancy in the office of County Solicitor, Clerk or other officer of the Court of Record in and for Escambia County, Florida, from any cause, the successor to fill such vacancy shall be appointed by the Governor to serve for the unexpired term of such office which has become vacant.
'(1) Is the function of the judicial nominating commissions an executive function, which cannot be limited by legislative act?
'(2) If the answer to the question above is in the affirmative, does the Governor have the inherent or implied power to establish rules governing the operation of the nominating commissions, consistent with applicable provisions of the Florida Constitution?
'(3) If the answer to question number (1) is in the affirmative, but the answer to question number (2) is in the negative, do the judicial nominating commissions have inherent or implied power to make rules governing their operation, consistent with applicable provisions of the Florida Constitution?
'(4) If the answer to question number (3) is in the affirmative, is there any requirement that the rules be uniform throughout the state?'
In answering the first question, we should first review the history of Fla.Const. Art. V, § 11, F.S.A.
In the deliberations of the Florida Constitutional Revision Commission, it was proposed that judicial nominating commissions be created to screen applicants for judicial appointments within their respective juristions and to nominate the three best qualified persons to the Governor for his appointment. The commissions were to be an arm of the executive appointive power to supplant, at least in part, the Governor's so-called 'patronage committee' composed of political supporters, to insure that politics would not be the only criteria in the selection of judges, and to increase generally the efficiency of the judicial appointive process. Working Papers, Fla. Const. Rev. Comm., Vol. XI, p. 169, et seq. (Minutes on Amendment No. 164, December 12, 1966).
By Executive Order 71--40A, on July 23, 1971, you established judicial nominating Councils and prescribed rules for their operation. The stated objectives of this action included the premise that only the most qualified,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carlson v. Wiggins
...United States Constitution.17 See Compl. ¶ 61 (citing Richardson v. Koshiba, 693 F.2d 911, 914 (9th Cir.1982); In re Advisory Op. to the Governor, 276 So.2d 25, 29–30 (Fla.1973); and U.S. Const. art. II, § 2); Pls.' PI Br. at 12 (citing Richardson, 693 F.2d at 914 and McMillan v. Svetanoff,......
-
Matheson v. Ferry
...concluded, "(T)he power of appointment is intrinsically and historically an executive function." The court in In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, Fla., 276 So.2d 25, 29 (1973), went further and asserted, "The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicant......
-
Richardson v. Koshiba
...Rather, these responsibilities indicate that the Commission's functions are executive in nature. 10 Accord In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So.2d 25, 29 (Fla.1973) (function of Florida's judicial nominating commissions was executive in The Commission also argues that as an "arm o......
-
Butterworth v. Caggiano
...meanings according to the subject matter, but in the framework of contemporary societal needs and structure. In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 276 So.2d 25 (Fla.1973). Can it seriously be argued that the homestead exemption would have been intended to protect the forfeiture of a home when......
-
Revision 6: Strengthening the duty to provide public education.
...was to provide for a greater level of protection from governmental intrusion. Id. at 548. (66) In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29 (Fla. 1973). See also Department of Environ. Protection v. Millender, 666 So. 2d 882,886 (Fla 1996) (quoting Plante, 372 So. 2d at (67) Je......
-
Judicial selection in Florida: an executive branch perspective.
...for the legislature in certain egregious cases. See Little, supra note 4, at 27-28, 30-31. (41) In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29(30) (Fla. 1973); Kanner v. Frumkes, 353 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1977); White, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. at (42) In Re Advisory Opinion to......
-
Rethinking judicial nominating commissions: independence, accountability, and public support.
...does not make the appointment within sixty days of receipt of the nominations). (53.) Cf., e.g., In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 276 So. 2d 25, 29-30 (Fla. 1973) ("The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicants which results in the nomination of ......