Estes v. State, 27714
| Decision Date | 19 October 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 27714,27714 |
| Parties | James Alexander ESTES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Scarborough, Yates, Scarborough & Black, Abilene, By Max Chenoweth, for appellant.
Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.
One bill of exception presents the sole question on this appeal. It concerns the admission of a letter written upon the stationery of the Texas Department of Public Safety and reading as follows.
'Subject: L-42973/0-39-F. Examination of blood specimen taken from James Alexander Estes, to determine alcohol content, in connection with alleged driving while intoxicated in Abilene, Texas, November 13, 1954.
'Identification Bureau
Abilene Police Department
Abilene, Texas
'Dear Sir:
'We have completed the examination requested in connection with the above captioned subject and wish to report that the specimen contained 0.30 per cent alcohol by weight.
'It is our opinion that the individual was intoxicated at the time the specimen was taken.
'In the event testimony regarding the examination of the specimen is needed when this case comes to trial, please notify us in sufficient time to arrange for the chemist making the examination to be present in your court.
'Should this case be disposed of without our appearance, please advise the disposition in order that our files may be complete.
'We will retain this evidence in our files until advised by you of the disposition.
'Yours truly,
'Homer Garrison, Jr., Director
'By: Glen H. McLaughlin, Chief Bureau of Identification and Records.'
The letter was accompanied by the following certificate, also admitted in evidence.
'Certification of Report
'County of Travis
'State of Texas}
'I, the undersigned, C. H. Key, Assistant Chief, Bureau of Identification and Records, Department of Public Safety, Austin, Texas, hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the laboratory report covering examination of:
'Blood specimen taken from James Alexander Estes
as the same appears in my office in Austin, Travis County, Texas, and that I am the lawful custodian and possessor of said report.
'Signed by me at my office in Austin, Travis County, Texas, this the 16th day of May, A.D. 1955.
'C. H. Key
Assistant Chief
Bureau of Identification and Records
'Subscribed and sworn to before me by the said C. H. Key this the 16th day of May, A.D. 1955.
'Martha Chudej
Travis County, Austin, Texas
'Martha Chudej, Notary Public
Travis...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Long v. State
...Art. 500) by introducing into evidence the inculpatory ex parte affidavit of the allegedly involved woman. See also: Estes v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 122, 283 S.W.2d 52 (1955). Similar to the United States Supreme Court, this Court has also recognized and continues to approve exceptions to the......
-
Trevino v. State
...the record sought to be admitted into evidence. See Dingler v. State, 768 S.W.2d 305, 306 (Tex.Cr.App.1989); Estes v. State, 162 Tex.Crim. 122, 283 S.W.2d 52, 54 (Tex.Cr.App.1955). See also Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582 Furthermore, after examining the exhibit we are persuaded that it does ......
-
Porter v. State
...of the fact finding process commensurate with the constitutional rights of confrontation and cross-examination. See Estes v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 122, 283 S.W.2d 52 (1955); Hartman v. Harder, 322 S.W.2d 555 (Tex.Civ.App. Amarillo 1959, no Texas Dept. of Public Safety v. Nesmith, 559 S.W.2d ......
-
Tamminen v. State
...of the fact finding process commensurate with the constitutional rights of confrontation and cross-examination. See Estes v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 122, 283 S.W.2d 52 (1955); Hartman v. Harder, 322 S.W.2d 555 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1959, no writ). Id. at 746. Reversing the case, the court sa......