Valley Baptist Med. Ctr v. Gonzalez

Decision Date26 October 2000
Docket NumberNo. 00-0285,00-0285
Parties(Tex. 2000) Valley Baptist Medical Center, Petitioner v. Ester V. Gonzalez, as next friend of M. G., Jr., Respondent
CourtTexas Supreme Court

PER CURIAM

Ester Gonzalez, individually and as next friend of Michael Gonzalez, filed a petition to investigate claims under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202 in anticipation of a products liability suit. She named as respondents Valley Baptist Medical Center, Dr. Edwin Mierisch, and the unknown manufacturers of a fetal vacuum extractor. The trial court granted the petition and ordered presuit discovery, including the deposition of a Valley Baptist representative, under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202.4(a)(2).

Valley Baptist filed a notice of appeal with an emergency motion to stay depositions; the court of appeals denied the emergency motion. Valley Baptist then filed a petition for writ of mandamus with an emergency motion to stay depositions. The court of appeals initially granted the stay but then, two weeks later, denied Valley Baptist's petition for writ of mandamus and vacated the stay. Valley Baptist subsequently filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court, which was denied.

In the meantime, another court of appeals panel granted Valley Baptist's motion to reconsider its motion for emergency relief to stay depositions. Gonzalez immediately filed a motion to vacate the stay order and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction; the court of appeals first denied Gonzalez' motion, but then sua sponte, reconsidered the motion and dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction in a published opinion.

While Valley Baptist's motion for rehearing en banc was pending, it produced a representative for the ordered deposition and notified the court of appeals that the dispute may be moot. The court of appeals, sitting en banc, then withdrew its earlier opinion, and, concluding that rule 202 presuit discovery orders are not final and appealable when the party from whom discovery is sought is an anticipated party to the litigation, dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 18 S.W.3d 673. In its opinion, the court of appeals did not acknowledge that Valley Baptist had already appeared for the deposition. Nor did the court consider whether the appeal may be moot.

In its petition for review, Valley Baptist argues that its dispute with Gonzalez became moot...

To continue reading

Request your trial
211 cases
  • Rusk State Hosp. v. Black
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • 31 Agosto 2012
    ...Constitution does not afford courts jurisdiction to make advisory decisions or issue advisory opinions. Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex.2000) (per curiam) (“Under article II, section 1 of the Texas Constitution, courts have no jurisdiction to issue advisory opi......
  • Masterson v. Diocese Texas
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • 21 Marzo 2014
    ...Constitution does not authorize courts to make advisory decisions or issue advisory opinions); Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex.2000) (per curiam) (“Under article II, section 1 of the Texas Constitution, courts have no jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions.”);......
  • Cadena Comercial USA Corp. v. Tex. Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • 28 Abril 2017
    ...department of government, to issue advisory opinions to the governor and other officials); Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez , 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000) ("Under article II, section 1 of the Texas Constitution, courts have no jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions."). Addressing the......
  • In re S.K.A.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • 17 Octubre 2007
    ...which is that it decides an abstract question of law without binding the parties. See TEX. CONST. art. II, § 1; Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821 (Tex.2000); Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, 964 S.W.2d 922, 928 (Tex.1998); Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 11 - 11-5 Depositions Before Suit or to Investigate Claims
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Discovery Title Chapter 11 Depositions—Texas Rules 199-203
    • Invalid date
    ...publication) (same); Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 18 S.W.3d 673, 678 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999) (same), vacated as moot, 33 S.W.3d 821 (Tex. 2000). [481] See In re Fernandez, No. 04-99-00841-CV, 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 9553, at *7-8, 1999 WL 1327603 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 30......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT