397 P.3d 90 (Wash. 2017), 92816-9, In re Personal Restraint of Lui

Docket Nº:92816-9
Citation:397 P.3d 90, 188 Wn.2d 525
Party Name:In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Sione P. Lui, Petitioner
Attorney:David B. Zuckerman (of Law Offices of David B. Zuckerman ), for petitioner. Daniel T. Satterberg, Prosecuting Attorney, and James M. Whisman, Deputy, for respondent.
Judge Panel:AUTHOR: Justice Steven C. González. WE CONCUR: Chief Justice Mary E. Fairhurst, Justice Susan Owens, Justice Debra L. Stephens, Justice Charles K. Wiggins, Justice Mary I. Yu, Laurel H. Siddoway, J. Pro Tem. AUTHOR: Justice Barbara A. Madsen. WE CONCUR: Justice Charles W. Johnson. Fairhurst, C.J....
Case Date:June 22, 2017
Court:Supreme Court of Washington

Page 90

397 P.3d 90 (Wash. 2017)

188 Wn.2d 525

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Sione P. Lui, Petitioner

No. 92816-9

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc

June 22, 2017

Argued: February 2, 2017.

Page 91

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 92

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 93

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 94

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 95

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 96

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 97

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 98

Appeal from King County Superior Court. 07-1-04039-7.

David B. Zuckerman (of Law Offices of David B. Zuckerman ), for petitioner.

Daniel T. Satterberg, Prosecuting Attorney, and James M. Whisman, Deputy, for respondent.

AUTHOR: Justice Steven C. González. WE CONCUR: Chief Justice Mary E. Fairhurst, Justice Susan Owens, Justice Debra L. Stephens, Justice Charles K. Wiggins, Justice Mary I. Yu, Laurel H. Siddoway, J. Pro Tem. AUTHOR: Justice Barbara A. Madsen. WE CONCUR: Justice Charles W. Johnson.


Steven C. Gonzalez, J.

Page 99

[188 Wn.2d 533] [¶1] Petitioner Sione P. Lui challenges his conviction for the second degree murder of his fiancé e, Elaina Boussiacos. 1 He seeks a new trial based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, Brady 2 nondisclosure, jury misconduct, and newly discovered evidence. The Court of Appeals dismissed each claim as meritless and denied Lui's request for a reference hearing. We affirm.

[188 Wn.2d 534]Factual and Procedural History

[¶2] Lui and Boussiacos began dating in 1999 and were engaged to be married by the following summer with no set date for their nuptial. The couple moved into a duplex in Woodinville, Washington, in early 2001. A month later, Boussiacos's body was discovered stuffed in the trunk of her car approximately one mile from the couple's Woodinville home. Her murder remained unsolved for several years until police detectives reexamined her case file and conducted further DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing in 2006. Lui was eventually charged with and convicted for her murder in 2008.

[¶3] The State's theory was that Lui killed Boussiacos after he learned she was leaving him. A few days before her disappearance, Boussiacos discovered Lui had been secretly communicating with a former girlfriend with whom he had previously had an affair. On Wednesday, January 31, Boussiacos confronted Lui about his deception. That same day, she informed a witness that the wedding was off, the relationship was over, and either she or Lui would be moving out of their home. Boussiacos closed the couple's joint banking account the next afternoon 3 and reaffirmed, albeit less resolutely, the following Friday that she was " probably" going to break up with Lui and was looking forward to being single again, 5 Report of Proceedings (RP) at 539. Boussiacos was last seen alive that Friday evening.

[¶4] Boussiacos was scheduled to travel to California the next morning, Saturday, February 3, 2001, at 8:30 a.m. to visit her mother, but she never boarded the plane. The last call made from Boussiacos's cell phone was at 7:04 a.m. to check her flight status. Her luggage and car were not at home, but the confirmation ticket for her rental car reservation in California was there.

[188 Wn.2d 535] ¶ 5 Police found Boussiacos's body six days later, on Friday, February 9, 2001, stuffed in the trunk of her car in the parking lot of the nearby Woodinville Athletic Club (WAC) approximately one mile from her home. Her death was caused by asphyxia due to neck compression.

[¶6] When police officers discovered her body, Boussiacos was wearing a white T-shirt, black sweat pants, and sneakers. By all accounts, Boussiacos wore only sweat pants and T-shirts to bed. Boussiacos was not wearing a bra, though a bra was wadded up and stuffed between her breasts. Her socks were twisted and pulled up too high, and her

Page 100

left shoelace was tied askew as if someone else had dressed her. Forensic testing of the shoelaces revealed DNA belonging to three male bloodlines. One bloodline belonged to either Lui or his son from a prior marriage. The second bloodline belonged to either Boussiacos's ex-husband, James Negron, or the son she shared with him. The identity of the third bloodline was unknown.

[¶7] Boussiacos's suitcase and travel bag 4 were found with her in the car. At trial, the State focused on the unusual way Boussiacos's travel bag was packed and missing typical travel items, which suggested, according to the State, that someone else probably packed it for her in haste. Notably, even though Boussiacos typically wore makeup when she went out in public, her makeup bag was not in either her suitcase or travel bag. Instead, loose in her travel bag were a hairbrush, deodorant, a hairdryer, a nearly empty bottle of hair gel, a second uncapped bottle of hair gel, an uncapped bottle of liquid makeup foundation, a compact of bronze makeup powder, a large bottle of lotion, a large bottle of nail polish remover, and several makeup brushes. There was no toothbrush or nail polish. In contrast, her suitcase was very neatly packed. It contained folded clothes, [188 Wn.2d 536] sandals, black boots, tennis shoes, and a small bottle of lotion.

[¶8] Despite the prolonged police investigation, the detectives suspected Lui early on. They suspected that he probably strangled Boussiacos at home, finished packing for her, stuffed her body in the trunk of her car, drove the car to the WAC, abandoned it there, and walked home. To corroborate their theory, the detectives hired a scent-detection specialist to locate Lui's scent at the WAC. The scent tracking occurred on February 14, 2001--11 days after Boussiacos's car was first spotted at the WAC. The dog traced Lui's scent from the car directly to his home.

[¶9] Lui, however, was not charged with Boussiacos's murder until 2007. Lui maintained his innocence at trial and was represented by defense attorney Anthony Savage. At trial, Savage criticized the detectives for being so determined in their pursuit to convict Lui that they failed to test obvious articles of Boussiacos's clothing for DNA and ignored all exculpatory DNA and fingerprint evidence they did obtain. Savage got the State's experts to admit that there were nine fingerprints lifted from Boussiacos's car, none of which belonged to Lui; that there was DNA belonging to an unknown male on the gearshift skirt of her car, as well as DNA belonging to an unknown male on her shoelaces; and that there was sperm possibly belonging to an unknown male inside Boussiacos's vagina. Savage even got the detectives to admit there was an earlier murder in Woodinville involving a female victim a few weeks prior to Boussiacos's disappearance and that they never considered the possibility that these two murders might have been linked.

[¶10] To refute the scent track evidence, Savage argued it was nearly impossible for the State's dog to track an 11-day-old scent trail left by Boussiacos's assailant when he or she abandoned the car at the WAC. Instead, Savage explained it was more likely that the dog was tracking the scent trail left by Lui 8 days earlier when he and his friend [188 Wn.2d 537] Senisi Taumoefolau were at the WAC distributing missing person flyers to nearby businesses.

[¶11] After five hours of deliberations, the jury convicted Lui of second degree murder. Lui timely filed this personal restraint petition, 5 claiming he is entitled to a new trial, or at least a reference hearing, because (1) Savage provided ineffective assistance, (2) the State failed to disclose internal police disciplinary records in violation of Brady, (3) the jury improperly considered extrinsic evidence, and (4) the parties acquired newly discovered DNA evidence. The Court of Appeals denied each claim. In re Pers. Restraint

Page 101

of Lui, No. 72478-9-I (Wash. Ct.App. Jan. 19, 2016) (unpublished), http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/724789.pdf. Lui sought review in this court, which we granted. In re Pers. Restraint of Lui, 186 Wn.2d 1008, 380 P.3d 504 (2016). We now affirm.



Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Related Prosecutorial Misconduct Claims

[¶12] Lui contends his trial attorney, Savage, was ineffective because he (a) was inattentive at trial, (b) failed to prepare Taumoefolau for trial, (c) failed to hire a scent track expert for the defense to rebut the State's expert, (d) failed to elicit testimony establishing a later date for when Boussiacos's car appeared at the WAC, (e) failed to impeach lead detective Denny Gulla about his lengthy disciplinary history, (f) failed to argue Boussiacos's ex-husband was a possible suspect, (g) failed to present evidence that Lui was physically incapable of manually strangling Boussiacos with his right arm due to an earlier injury, (h) failed to object when the detectives commented on Lui's veracity, (i) [188 Wn.2d 538] failed to object when the prosecutor suggested that Lui may have strangled Boussiacos during the course of a sexual assault, (j) failed to object when the detectives and the prosecutor described Lui's reaction to Boussiacos's disappearance and murder as inconsistent with an innocent, grieving partner, and (k) failed to object when the prosecutor asked questions about Lui's religion. 6 Lui also raises separate but related prosecutorial misconduct claims based on the detectives' testimony, the prosecutor's questions regarding Lui's Mormon faith, and the prosecutor's suggestion during closing that Lui may have sexually assaulted Boussiacos during the course of the murder.

[¶13] We review ineffective assistance of counsel claims de novo. State v. Sutherby, 165 Wn.2d 870, 883, 204 P.3d 916 (2009) (citing In re Pers....

To continue reading