Hoy v. Firestone, 65598

Decision Date24 July 1984
Docket NumberNo. 65598,65598
Citation453 So.2d 814
PartiesJohn J. HOY, Petitioner, v. George FIRESTONE, Secretary of State of the State of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

John J. Hoy, West Palm Beach, pro per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Mitchell D. Franks, Chief Trial Counsel and James W. Sloan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Joseph W. Little, Gainesville, and Marshall R. Cassedy of McFarlain, Bobo, Sternstein, Wiley & Cassedy, Tallahassee, intervenor for Nath C. Doughtie.

McDONALD, Justice.

John Hoy petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the secretary of state to place Hoy's name on the September ballot for the 1984 nonpartisan judicial elections for a newly created circuit judgeship in the fifteenth judicial circuit. We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(8), Florida Constitution, but refuse to issue the writ.

Chapter 84-303, Laws of Florida, provides for additional judges in the second, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, fifteenth, and twentieth judicial circuits and in Broward, Dade, Hillsborough, Indian River, Palm Beach, Pasco, and Seminole counties. Ch. 84-303, §§ 6, 7, Laws of Fla. Section 8 of chapter 84-303 provides that the new judges in all but the eighth and fifteenth circuits and Palm Beach County "shall be elected in the nonpartisan elections in 1984 and shall take office on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January, 1985." The effective date for all of the act except section 8, which contains its own effective date, is October 1, 1984. Ch. 84-303, § 9, Laws of Fla.

The nonpartisan judicial elections are scheduled for September 4, 1984, with the qualifying period running from July 16 through July 20, 1984. Hoy, an elector of the State of Florida, a resident of Palm Beach County, and a member of The Florida Bar, tendered the qualifying papers and fees for the new judgeship in the fifteenth circuit on July 16. The elections division, however, refused to accept Hoy's papers and fees, being of the opinion that the office of additional judge for the fifteenth circuit was not to be filled by election. Hoy then brought his petition before this Court.

We agree with the secretary of state's office and hold that the legislature, when creating these offices, intended that the additional judicial offices in the eighth and fifteenth circuits and in Palm Beach County are to be filled by gubernatorial appointment rather than by election. We find no justification for this Court to interfere with that decision.

A vacancy in office occurs upon the creation of an office. Art. X, § 3, Fla. Const. Article V, section 11(b) of the Florida Constitution provides in part:

The governor shall fill each vacancy on a circuit court or on a county court by appointing for a term ending on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January of the year following the next primary and general election, one of not fewer than three persons nominated by the appropriate judicial nominating commission.

Because the legislative enactment creating the new judicial offices in the eighth and fifteenth circuits and in Palm Beach County is effective on October 1, 1984, these offices will come into existence between the current year's primary and general elections. These offices, therefore, should be filled by appointment for terms to end in January 1987.

A similar result obtained in 1982 when the legislature enacted chapter 82-238, Laws of Florida. Sections 2 and 3 of that act created numerous new judgeships. Section 5, however, directed that the holders of three of the new offices be elected, to take office in January 1983. According to section 8, on the other hand, everything but those three...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Hialeah, Inc., 86-104
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 23 Septiembre 1986
  • Judicial Nominating Commission v. Cobb, Case No. SC06-1294 (Fla. 7/14/2006), Case No. SC06-1294.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 2006
    ...Case No. SC06-1294. Supreme Court of Florida. July 14, 2006. The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Hoy v. Firestone, 453 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 1984); Advisory Opinion to the Governor re: Appointment or Election of Judges, 824 So. 2d 132 (Fla. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALL......
  • Lebedeker v. Firestone, 65618
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 24 Julio 1984
    ...D. Franks, Chief Trial Counsel and James W. Sloan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Denied. Hoy v. Firestone, 453 So.2d 814 (Fla.1984). We decline to rule on the other issues sought to be raised because the instant petition can be disposed of without reaching It is......
  • Burlington v. Firestone, 65603
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 24 Julio 1984
    ...D. Franks, Chief Trial Counsel and James W. Sloan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Denied. Hoy v. Firestone, 453 So.2d 814 (Fla.1984). It is so BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT