Theisen v. Old Republic Ins. Co.
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1081,468 So.2d 434 |
| Decision Date | 02 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-801,84-801 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1081 Mary Gwendolyn Thomas THEISEN, etc., Appellant, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, et al, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Sidney H. Parrish of Troutman, Parrish, Williams & Blankenship, P.A., Winter Park, for appellant.
Robert D. Keough of Woolfolk & Estes, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.
This case involves a motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), for relief from a final judgment on the ground that a subsequent appellate decision in an unrelated case changed the rule of law upon which the final judgment was based.
Appellant, the personal representative of a deceased employee with worker's compensation benefits, sued the employer's subcontractor based on negligence of the subcontractor's employee causing the death of the employee. This court affirmed the trial court ruling that the worker's compensation law barred the action. See Theisen v. Simmons, 419 So.2d 662 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Later, in a completely unrelated case, the Florida Supreme Court apparently adopted a contrary view. See Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Abernathy, 442 So.2d 953 (Fla.1983). Based on Abernathy, appellant moved the trial court under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) for relief from the prior judgment in Theisen and appeals a denial of its motion. We affirm.
The original judgment in Theisen became final when the time for rehearing and certiorari review in that case expired and passed beyond the authority of this court to reconsider after expiration of the term in which it was rendered in this court. 1 The doctrine of res judicata bars appellant's relief from the judgment in Theisen. See Plymouth Citrus Products Co-Op. v. Williamson, 71 So.2d 162 (Fla.1954); Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Roper, 438 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
After a judgment has become truly final, a change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground for relief from the prior final judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). See Plymouth Citrus Products Co-Op. v. Williamson, supra; American Fire and Casualty Company v. Dawson, 400 So.2d 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Ellis National Bank of Tallahassee v. Davis, 379 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See also Penthouse North Association v. Lombardi, 461 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1984). Cf. Brunner Enterprises Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 452 So.2d 550 (Fla.1984), where the cause was still pending as to the parties and issue and the appellate court had...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chavez v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co.
...malicious prosecution count. Roper, 438 So. 2d at 1048 (second, third, and fourth emphasis added); accord Theisen v. Old Republic Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 434, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Based upon the well-established law, we hold that to the extent that our post- Slayton jurisprudence, issued w......
-
Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hallandale Open Mri, LLC
...reliance on Petrysian v. Metropolitan General Insurance Co., 672 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), and Theisen v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 468 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), is misplaced. Those decisions addressed a different question altogether: whether a litigant may obtain post-judgmen......
-
Fox v. Timepayment Corp.
...case is not a ground [under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) ] to vacate a final order." (citing Theisen v. Old Republic Ins. , 468 So. 2d 434, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) )); Williams v. Skylink Jets, Inc. , 229 So. 3d 1275, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (recognizing that a final judgment r......
-
Petrysian v. Metropolitan General Ins. Co., 95-1642
...law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground to vacate a final order. Theisen v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 468 So.2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). We regret that appellant was frustrated by the timing of the supreme court's decisions, but we cannot grant r......