United States v. Hinkson, 05-30303.
| Decision Date | 20 October 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 05-30303.,05-30303. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Roland HINKSON, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Michael D. Taxay, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Dennis P. Riordan, Donald M. Horgan, Esquire, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA, Curtis R. Smith, Esquire, Thompson Smith Woolf Anderson, PLLC, Idaho Falls, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges SILVERMAN and TALLMAN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
- United States v. Franklin
-
U.S. v. Seljan
... 547 F.3d 993 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... John W. SELJAN, ... ...
-
United States v. Franklin
...of Land, More or Less, 546 F.3d 613, 617 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. Hinkson, 526 F.3d 1262, 1277 (9th Cir. 2008), vacated, 547 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (mem.)). We have explicated that definition further, in the context of granting a new trial, in our en banc opinio......
- Lefler v. U.S.
Request a trial to view additional results