Crawford v. Results Oriented, Inc.
| Decision Date | 11 June 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. S00G1817, No. S00G1992., No. S00G1820 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | CRAWFORD v. RESULTS ORIENTED, INC. Crawford v. Green Tree Financial Servicing Corporation. Crawford v. Cavalier Homes of Alabama, Inc. et al. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
T. Michael Flinn, Carrollton, for appellant.
Phears & Moldovan, Victor L. Moldovan, Norcross, for appellee (case no. S00G1817).
Kenney & Solomon, Thomas S. Kenney, Robert J. Solomon, Debbie W. Flesch, Duluth, for appellees (case no. S00G1820).
Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Rex D. Smith, Ian R. Rapaport, Beth S. Reeves, Atlanta, for appellants (case no. S00G1992).
Ray Crawford purchased a mobile home from Results Oriented, Inc. for $76,000. The mobile home was manufactured by Cavalier Homes of Alabama. Green Tree Financial Servicing Corporation financed Crawford's purchase of the mobile home.
At the time of sale, Crawford signed documents that required him to arbitrate any claim against the manufacturer, dealer, or lender in Alabama. The dealer presented these documents to Crawford as "standard" for mobile home sales. Though the dealer did not advise Crawford to read or review the documents prior to signing, Crawford was not prevented from doing so.
The arbitration clause was set out in all capital letters and clearly indicated that Crawford would waive his right to a jury trial over any dispute regarding his purchase. However, the clause failed to indicate that Crawford would be responsible for at least portions of the arbitration costs.
Later, when Crawford alleged defects in design and construction of his mobile home, he brought suit in state court against the manufacturer, the dealer and the lender. All three defendants moved for a stay in proceedings and to compel arbitration. The state court denied the motions, finding the arbitration clause procedurally and substantively unconscionable under the two-pronged analysis outlined in NEC Technologies v. Nelson, 267 Ga. 390, 478 S.E.2d 769 (1996). The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that undisclosed arbitration fees could not be the basis for unconscionability. Results Oriented v. Crawford, 245 Ga.App. 432, 538 S.E.2d 73 (2000).
We granted certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the arbitration clause is not unconscionable. We find the Court of Appeals' opinion to be correct and consistent with the United States Supreme Court's recent holding in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 121 S.Ct. 513, 148 L.Ed.2d 373 (2000) (). See also Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp., 343 S.C. 531, 542 S.E.2d 360 (2001) (); Green Tree Financial Corp. of Alabama v. Vintson, 753 So.2d 497 (Ala.1999) (). It follows that Crawford must arbitrate any claim against defendants, including the validity of the arbitration clause itself.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except BENHAM, C.J., who dissents.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes LLC
...arbitration of express and implied warranty claims, unless arbitration clause is unconscionable), aff'd as Crawford v. Results Oriented, Inc., 273 Ga. 884, 548 S.E.2d 342 (2000); Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. Ard, 772 So.2d 1131, 1135 (Ala.2000) (holding arbitration provisions of a written......
-
Walker v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., 27A02-0507-CV-596.
...869, 125 S.Ct. 88, 160 L.Ed.2d 115 (2004); In re Am. Homestar of Lancaster, Inc., 50 S.W.3d 480 (Tex.2001); Crawford v. Results Oriented, Inc., 273 Ga. 884, 548 S.E.2d 342 (2001); S. Energy Homes, Inc. v. Ard, 772 So.2d 1131 (Ala.2000); but see Parkerson v. Smith, 817 So.2d 529 (Miss. 2002)......
-
Borowiec v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.
...845 So.2d 303 (Fla.App.2003)), Georgia (see Results Oriented, Inc. v. Crawford, 245 Ga-App. 432, 538 S.E.2d 73 (2000), aff'd, 273 Ga. 884, 548 S.E.2d 342 (2001)), Louisiana (see Howell v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc., 819 So.2d 461 (La. App.2002)) and Michigan (see Abela v. General M......
-
Jones v. Waffle House, Inc.
...se unconscionable." In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig. , 672 F.3d 1224, 1229 (11th Cir. 2012) (citing Crawford v. Results Oriented, Inc. , 273 Ga. 884, 548 S.E.2d 342, 343 (2001) ). In this case, it is true that Jones's business acumen and experience fell below that of his employer. An......
-
Trial Practice and Procedure - Matthew E. Cook, Terrance C. Sullivan, Jason Crawford, Leigh H. Martin, and Michael A. Eddings
...768-69, 560 S.E.2d at 335. 125. Id. at 772, 560 S.E.2d at 337. 126. Id. 127. Restatement (Second) of Torts Sec. 328D cmt. D (1965). 128. 273 Ga. 884, 548 S.E.2d 342 (2001). 129. Id. at 885, 548 S.E.2d at 343. 130. Continental Ins. Co. v. Equity Residential Props. Trust, 255 Ga. App. 445, 44......
-
A Primer on Predispute Employment Arbitration Agreements
...laws would undermine agreements to arbitrate); see also Results Oriented, Inc. v. Crawford, 538 S.E. 2d 73, 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000), affd 548 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. 2001) (recognizing federal preemption of state law). [20] The Georgia Arbitration Act shall not apply to "[a]ny contract relating to t......