Ex parte Fisher
| Decision Date | 13 September 1991 |
| Citation | 587 So.2d 1039 |
| Parties | Ex parte Manson FISHER, Jr. (Re Manson Fisher, Jr. v. State). 1901499. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals (1 Div. 948). Appeal from the Circuit Court, Washington County, No. CC-88-027P, J. Richmond Pearson, Judge.
David Schoen, Montgomery, for appellant.
James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Robin Blevins, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 587 So.2d 1027.
WRIT DENIED.
The petitioner raises several issues that he claims are meritorious, including a claim that the prosecutor used his peremptory strikes to exclude women from his jury. I think that this claim has merit, and I would grant his petition for the writ of certiorari to address that claim.
According to the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals, the petitioner's counsel objected to the prosecutor's striking of women from the jury, whereupon the prosecutor responded by stating that women were not a "racially cognizable group defined under Batson," and that, even if Batson applies, the defendant was not a female and, therefore, would lack standing to raise the issue.
The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with the State's argument and held that "the standards of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), do not extend to 'gender based' peremptory strikes." 587 So.2d at 1030.
In Ex parte Bankhead, 585 So.2d 112 (Ala.1991), this Court, although holding on original deliverance that a white defendant lacked standing to challenge the prosecutor's striking of black prospective jurors, on rehearing followed Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991), in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a white defendant had standing to challenge the striking of black veniremen from his jury as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. In Bankhead, this Court noted that the United States Supreme Court has held "that a defendant in a criminal case can raise a third-party equal protection claim on behalf of jurors excluded by the prosecution because of their race," and further said that "[b]ased on Powers, we must now hold that Bankhead, a white, has standing under the Equal Protection Clause to challenge the prosecutor's allegedly racially motivated use of peremptory challenges." 585 So.2d at 117.
Shortly after Powers was released, the United States Supreme Court held, in Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 500 U.S. 614, 111 S.Ct. 2077, 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991), that the principles enunciated in Batson applied in civil cases. Shortly after its Edmonson decision was released, the Court, in Sky Chefs, Inc. v. Dias, 501 U.S. 1201, 111 S.Ct. 2791, 115 L.Ed.2d 965 (1991), issued a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals "for further consideration in light of Edmonson v. Leesville...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lindsay v. State
... ... error is "particularly egregious" and if it "seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings." See Ex parte Price , 725 So.2d 1063 (Ala. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1133, 119 S.Ct. 1809, 143 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1999) ; Burgess v. State , 723 So.2d 742 (Ala ... for a challenge for cause, may constitute a 326 So.3d 27 race-neutral and reasonable explanation for the exercise of a peremptory strike." Fisher v. State , 587 So.2d 1027, 1036 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)." Bohannon v. State , 222 So.3d 457, 482 (Ala. Crim. App. 2015). Lindsay also argues that ... ...
-
Clark v. State
... ... Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial court was then to evaluate these reasons in accordance with Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing (Ala.1987). The appellant in this case is white. Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 ... State, 581 So.2d 548 (Ala.Cr.App.1991) (potential jurors properly struck pursuant to their connections with law enforcement); Fisher v. State, 587 So.2d 1027 (Ala.Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, 587 So.2d 1039 (Ala.1991) (potential juror struck where he indicated bias because the case ... ...
-
George v. State
... ... George v. State , 717 So.2d 849 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997). The Alabama Supreme Court subsequently affirmed this Court's decision. Ex parte George , 717 So.2d 858 (Ala. 1998). The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. George v. Alabama , 525 U.S. 1024, 119 S.Ct. 556, 142 ... State , 368 So.2d 554, writ. quashed, Ala., 368 So.2d 565 (1978)." Thomas v. State , 393 So.2d 504, 509 (Ala. Cr. App. 1981). " Fisher v. State , 587 So.2d 1027, 1039 (Ala. Cr. App.), cert. denied, 587 So.2d 1039 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 941, 112 S.Ct. 1486, 117 L.Ed.2d ... ...
-
Johnson v. State
... ... 'plain error' in a capital case, the Alabama Supreme Court has looked to the federal court's interpretation of what is 'plain error.' See Ex parte Harrell, 470 So.2d 1309 (Ala.1985); Ex parte Womack, 435 So.2d 766 (Ala.1983) [cert. denied, 464 U.S. 986, 104 S.Ct. 436, 78 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983) ] ... See Fisher v. State, 587 So.2d 1027 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, Ex parte Fisher, 587 So.2d 1039 (Ala.1991). Questions which concern jurors' attitudes ... ...