Guggenheim v. City Of Goleta, 06-56306.
| Decision Date | 12 March 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 06-56306.,06-56306. |
| Citation | 598 F.3d 1061 |
| Parties | Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King & Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams & Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Guggenheim v. City of Goleta
...528, 125 S.Ct. 2074, 161 L.Ed.2d 876 (2005). 13. Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 582 F.3d 996 (9th Cir.2009). 14. Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir.2010). 15. Carmen v. San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1029 (9th Cir.2001). 16. Guggenheim, 582 F.3d at 1004 n.......
-
Norse v. City Of Santa Cruz, 07-15814.
...598 F.3d 1061Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official c......