598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2010), 06-56306, Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Docket Nº:06-56306.
Citation:598 F.3d 1061
Opinion Judge:KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Party Name:Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Attorney:Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King & Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams & Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case Date:March 12, 2010
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1061

598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2010)

Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-56306.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 12, 2010

Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King & Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams & Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP