Hansen v. Hansen

Decision Date28 December 1979
Docket NumberNo. 79CA0419,79CA0419
Citation43 Colo.App. 525,608 P.2d 364
PartiesTom HANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard HANSEN, Defendant, and Shirley Hansen, Defendant-Appellee. . II
CourtColorado Court of Appeals

Taussig & Flowers, P. C., John G. Taussig, Jr., Boulder, for plaintiff-appellant.

Martin, Brauchli & Jevons, E. Gregory Martin, Barre M. Sakol, Boulder, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against his mother for willful and wanton negligence and the intentional infliction of emotional distress by extreme and outrageous conduct. We affirm.

Plaintiff lived with his parents until he quit school in the 10th grade. Approximately two years prior to that time plaintiff had been suspended from school for smoking and selling marijuana. As punishment for being suspended, he was required by his parents to cut weeds in their backyard. Plaintiff was also allegedly struck on the ear by his father during an altercation over plaintiff's use of marijuana. After quitting school in the tenth grade, plaintiff was subsequently sent to a private school in Italy, where he remained for three months before being expelled. Thereafter, he resided with his parents only for short periods, and his parents conditioned any further continuing support on his either attending school or seeking employment.

Plaintiff brought action against defendant claiming that her actions on these and other occasions constituted willful and wanton neglect of plaintiff's need for food, clothing, shelter, and psychological support; that defendant's actions were done with callous disregard for plaintiff's fragile psychological condition; and that defendant knew or should have know that her conduct was likely to cause severe emotional harm to plaintiff. Plaintiff asserted that as a result of defendant's actions he suffered severe mental distress, anguish, and irreparable harm to his mental health; that he will require psychiatric care for the remainder of his life; and that he has suffered physical damage from malnutrition. Although these allegations were also made against the father, service was never obtained upon him.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in dismissing his claims because there remain genuine issues of fact as to defendant's conduct and state of mind, and because conflicting inferences can be drawn about defendant's state of mind from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Karam v. Allstate Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1982
    ...v. Inmon (1980), 268 Ark. 221, 594 S.W.2d 853. 3. Colorado, Horton v. Reaves (1974), 186 Colo. 149, 526 P.2d 304; Hansen v. Hansen (Colo.App.1979), 608 P.2d 364, 365. 4. Georgia, Wisenbaker v. Zeigler (1976), 140 Ga.App. 90, 230 S.E.2d 97. 5. Idaho, Pedigo v. Rowley, supra. 6. Illinois, Ger......
  • Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • March 31, 1983
    ...physical injury, subject to the limitations as set forth in Restatement (Second) of Torts Sec. 46 (1965). See also Hansen v. Hansen, 608 P.2d 364 (Colo.App.); Meiter v. Cavanaugh, 580 P.2d 399 (Colo.App.); Enright v. Groves, 560 P.2d 851 (Colo.App.). We will focus on Sec. 46 of the Restatem......
  • Kirk v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • December 2, 1987
    ...hiree, along with other employees of an office that was closed, did not state a claim for outrageous conduct. In Hansen v. Hansen, 43 Colo.App. 525, 608 P.2d 364, 365-66 (1979), the court affirmed the trial court's action granting summary judgment to a defendant who had been sued by her son......
  • Riske v. King Soopers
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 22, 2004
    ...or substantially certain." Zalnis, 645 P.2d at 294 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, comment i, and Hansen v. Hansen, 43 Colo.App. 525, 608 P.2d 364 (1979)). Here, the facts would permit a jury to find that Mr. Katzenberger knew that his ongoing overt and covert conduct actually c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • A Survey of Outrageous Conduct Under Colorado Law: Part I
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 28-1, January 1999
    • Invalid date
    ...judgment. "Plaintiff cites no authority for her assertion that an illegal search constitutes outrageous conduct." Id. Hansen v. Hansen, 608 P.2d 364 (Colo. App. 1979), denied (Colo. 1980): "Plaintiff lived with his parents until he quit school in the 10th grade." Id. at 365. "Approximately ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT