First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin County
Decision Date | 25 June 1993 |
Citation | 623 So.2d 1075 |
Parties | FIRST MERCURY SYNDICATE, INC. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, et al. 1911638. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
A. Stewart O'Bannon, Jr. of O'Bannon & O'Bannon, Florence, for appellant.
Eddie Beason of Fine & McDowell, Russellville, for Franklin County, Franklin County Com'n, and Larry Plott, sheriff of Franklin County, Ala.
Steve A. Baccus of Almon, McAlister, Ashe, Baccus & Tanner, Tuscumbia, and Jeffrey R. Gaither and Anthony J. Roose of Klineman, Rose, Wolf and Wallack, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, for Star Pool.
First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. ("FMS"), appeals from a judgment declaring that FMS owed a duty to defend and/or indemnify its insureds--Franklin County, the Franklin County Commission, and Larry Plott, the sheriff of Franklin County--against the wrongful death claim asserted by Willa Thomson, the administratrix of the estate of the deceased, Harold McCarley. The issue is whether the language in the insurance policy excluded Thomson's claim from coverage.
On October 8, 1986, Franklin County purchased professional liability insurance for its law enforcement officers from The Star Pool, a self-insurance membership pool. The County renewed its membership with The Star Pool in 1987, 1988, and 1989.
On or about March 28, 1989, Harold McCarley attempted suicide while incarcerated in the Franklin County jail; McCarley died on March 31 from the injuries he inflicted on himself. On September 25, 1989, Willa Thomson, the administratrix of McCarley's estate, filed a claim with the Franklin County Commission against the County pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 11-12-1 et seq.; this claim demanded $100,000 for various acts of misfeasance and nonfeasance on the part of the County. The County notified The Star Pool of this claim, and The Star Pool conducted some investigation with respect to the claim.
The County remained a member of The Star Pool until October 1990, when Probate Judge Larry Jackson, chairman of the County Commission, was contacted by Jim Cantwell. Cantwell informed Judge Jackson that The Star Pool was experiencing financial trouble, and Cantwell suggested that the County obtain a new insurance carrier. Judge Jackson testified that he was concerned about obtaining retroactive coverage for the McCarley incident and that Cantwell assured him that, as an agent of FMS, 1 he (Cantwell) could write a policy with retroactive coverage. The County then terminated its membership in The Star Pool and purchased similar insurance from FMS; in the application the County notified FMS of McCarley's attempted suicide.
On March 5, 1991, The Star Pool informed the County that it would not cover the claim, because of the County's failure to renew its membership. The County then contacted FMS about the claim. FMS, on March 20, denied the claim, stating:
A week later, Thomson filed a wrongful death action against the County. On April 26, the County filed a declaratory judgment action, seeking to have the court hold that either The Star Pool or FMS, or both, had a duty to defend it against Thomson's claim. Before the hearing on the action, The Star Pool agreed to defend and/or indemnify the County. Following the hearing, the trial court held that FMS did have a duty to defend and/or indemnify the County; FMS appeals.
This Court first notes that although the trial court heard the testimony of two witnesses, the ore tenus rule does not apply here, because the question of whether an insurance policy is ambiguous is a question of law for the trial court. 2 Upton v. Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co., 469 So.2d 548 (Ala.1985). Therefore, no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's ruling, and this Court must review that ruling de novo.
FMS argues that it is not required to defend and/or indemnify the County because, it argues, the language in the policy unambiguously provides that claims filed against the County before October 9, 1990, are not covered under the policy. FMS relies on two provisions in the policy and related documents to support this argument. The first provision, which appears in bold type on the declarations page and on the first page of the policy, reads:
The other language relied upon by FMS reads:
"This insurance does not apply to any 'claim' made against you prior to the inception of the 'policy period.' "
The declarations...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...decided by the trial court. Hutchinson v. Attorneys Ins. Mut. of Alabama, Inc., 631 So.2d 975 (Ala.1994); First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin County, 623 So.2d 1075 (Ala.1993). "It is well settled in Alabama that when a contract is interpreting the language in an insurance contract, r......
-
Ala. Gas Corp. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.
...by the trial court. Auto–Owners Ins. Co. v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 739 So.2d 1078, 1081 (Ala.1999); First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin County, 623 So.2d 1075 (Ala.1993). “A contract is not ambiguous merely because the parties disagree upon the correct interpretation or upon whether......
-
Town of Elberta v. Ala. Dep't of Labor
...702 So.2d 1215, 1221 (Ala.1997) (citing Helms v. Helms' Kennels, Inc., 646 So.2d 1343 (Ala.1994), and First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin Cnty., 623 So.2d 1075 (Ala.1993) ). Section 25–4–78, Ala.Code 1975, provides, in pertinent part:"An individual shall be disqualified for total or p......
-
Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.
...58, 59 (Ala.Civ.App.1997); Plus Int'l, Inc. v. Pace, 689 So.2d 160, 161 (Ala. Civ.App.1996); see also First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin County, 623 So.2d 1075, 1076 (Ala.1993); DeWitt v. Stevens, 598 So.2d 849, 850 3. This statement is subject to a caveat, which is addressed in Part......
-
Determining an Insurer's Duty to Defend
...proferentum, that ambiguities in a contract are construed against the drafter. See First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Franklin County, 623 So. 2d 1075, 1077 (Ala. 1993); Jehle-Slauson Constr. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects & Consulting Eng'rs, 435 So. 2d 716, 720 (Ala. 1983). This doctrine is ap......