State v. Spencer
Decision Date | 18 June 1901 |
Citation | 164 Mo. 23,63 S.W. 1112 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE ex rel. FUNKHOUSER v. SPENCER et al. |
John H. Overall and Chas. W. Bates, for plaintiff. W. E. Fisse, G. A. Finkelnburg, and Clinton Rowell, for defendants.
This is an original proceeding in prohibition to prohibit the respondents from carrying out an order of Hon. Selden P. Spencer, as judge of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, on the other respondents, as election commissioners of that city, to examine the ballots, and compare them with the voting lists, cast at the general election in the year 1900, in the city of St. Louis, for the office of coroner of that city. Robert M. Funkhouser, the relator, was the Democratic nominee for the office of coroner of St. Louis at the general election in 1900, and Henry Lloyd was the Republican nominee. Funkhouser was declared elected, and Lloyd instituted a contest for the office, and among other grounds therefor he procured from the board of election commissioners a printed copy of the entire list of registered voters of the city of St. Louis, containing about 130,000 names, and, after erasing a few hundred names therefrom, made the same a part of his notice, and stated in the notice that the list contained the names of voters to whom he objected, stating his reasons for so objecting. Among the names of persons so objected to was that of Lloyd himself. Thereafter he applied to Judge Spencer for an order on the election commissioners to examine and recount all the ballots cast at said election for said office, and to compare such ballots with the voting lists, and to certify the result of such examination, recount, and comparison to the circuit court. Judge Spencer, sitting as such judge of said court, made the order asked, the portion thereof essential to this controversy being as follows: The election commissioners gave relator notice of intention to comply with the order, and thereupon he applied for and obtained from this court a preliminary rule against the said judge, the election commissioners, and Henry Lloyd, contestee, prohibiting them from proceeding as proposed. The returns set up the order and justify it. The relator moved to quash the return of the judge, and demurred to the return of Lloyd.
1. The pivotal question involved is whether the circuit court had power to order the election commissioners and the parties litigant to make a comparison of the ballots with the voting lists, and to require the election commissioners to return and certify to the court "all the facts which either of the parties to the aforesaid election contest may desire and request to have returned, and which may appear from the said ballots, and the examination and comparison thereof." Section 3 of article 8 of the constitution is as follows: We thus start the solution of the question with the mandate of the constitution that all elections shall be by ballot. An election...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Lashly v. Becker
...the contents of the ballot, as he must under this constitutional provision, what then becomes of the secret ballot so much discussed in the Spencer case? With its contents exposed the terms of the Constitution we have but the faded paper securely locked in the ballot box by the Spencer and ......
-
State ex rel. Penrose v. Killoren
... ... no notice at all because it fails to state when the contest ... will be brought or determined. The circuit court is without ... jurisdiction where the notice required by the statute has not ... been served upon contestee within the time provided ... State ex rel. Hancock v. Spencer, 166 Mo. 279, 65 ... S.W. 984; State ex rel. Brown v. Stewart, 313 Mo. 1, ... 281 S.W. 768; State ex rel. Woodson v. Robinson, 270 ... Mo. 212, 192 S.W. 1001; Ramsey v. Huck, 267 Mo. 333, ... 184 S.W. 966; Sec. 11632, R.S. 1939. (4) The statute ... governing election contests constitutes a ... ...
-
State v. Becker
...conclusive on the courts, was overruled in the recent case of State ex rel. Pollock v. Becker, 233 S. W. 341. In State ex rel. Funkhauser v. Spencer, 164 Mo. 23, 63 S. W. 1112, we prohibited the opening of the ballot boxes and the examination and comparison of the ballots with the list of t......
-
Armantrout v. Bohon
... ... there is no provision in the statutes for the use of a ... demurrer to the notice. Secs. 11632, 11636, 11638, R. S ... 1939; State ex rel. v. Spencer, 166 Mo. 279; ... State ex rel. Hartly v. Gideon, 40 S.W.2d 745; ... State ex rel. v. Ellison, 190 S.W. 276; State ex ... rel ... ...