Elliott v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co.

Decision Date31 October 1877
PartiesELLIOTT v. HANNIBAL & ST. JOSEPH RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.--HON. JOHN T. REDD, Judge.

James Carr and H. B. Leach for appellant.

HOUGH, J.

This was an action brought under the 43rd section of the act in relation to railroad companies to recover double the value of two mules killed by the trains of the defendant, near its depot, within the town plat of the town of Ely, in Marion county. We held in the case of Edwards v. Hann. & St. Joe. R. R. Co., 66 Mo. 567, that no action can be maintained under the 43rd section of the railroad law for animals killed within the limits of a town or city. When animals are killed in towns and cities where fences have not been, but might lawfully be erected, the action should be brought under the 5th section of the damage act, which in all such cases dispenses with the proof of negligence. We do not mean to say that on the facts disclosed in the present record, an action could be successfully maintained under the last mentioned section; on that point we need not now express any opinion. We only mean to say that if plaintiff has any right of action, it is under that section or at common law.

It may not be inappropriate to remark, in this connection, that where, within the limits of a town or city, the original proprietor, or other person, shall take possession of and use for farming purposes lands dedicated to public use, which cross or abut upon the right of way of a railroad company, such occupancy will not make it lawful for the railroad company to fence such dedicated lands, and the absence of fences in such cases will not dispense with proof of negligence. Following the case above cited, the judgment in this case must be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

REVERSED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • McIntosh v. Hannibal & St. J. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • May 23, 1887
    ...Schooling v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 518; Morris v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 367; Lloyd v. Railroad, 49 Mo. 199; Rhea v. Railroad, 84 Mo. 348; Elliott v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 683; Railroad v. Campbell, 47 Mich. 265; Greely v. Railroad, 33 Minn. 136; Keyser v. Railroad, 56 Iowa 207; Railroad v. Wood, 82 Indian......
  • Rhea v. St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1884
    ...requiring them to be built.” Edwards v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 567; Shultz v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 324; Rowland v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 679; Elliott v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 683; Wallace v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 594. Ells v. Railroad, 48 Mo. 231, might, if not carefully considered, be taken as an authority against......
  • Edmunds v. Salt Lake & L.A. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1921
    ... ... 864; ... Meyer v. North Mo. R. Co., 35 Mo. 352; ... Elliott v. Hannibal & St. Joe Ry., 66 Mo ... 683; Rhea v. St. L. & S. F. Ry., 84 ... ...
  • Smith v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 1902
    ... ... Railroad, 66 Mo. 567-571; Cousins v ... Railroad, 66 Mo. 572; Elliott v. Railroad, 66 ... Mo. 683; Wymore v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 247; Rhea v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT