665 F.3d 625 (5th Cir. 2011), 11-40456, Lewis v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
|Citation:||665 F.3d 625|
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM:|
|Party Name:||Ray P. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AT GALVESTON; Dr. Garland Anderson, Provost and Dean of Medicine, in His Official Capacity; Dr. Tetsuo Ashizawa, Then Chairman of the Neurology Department, in His Official Capacity; Kirk Roden, Department Administrative Head; Dr. Claudio Soto; Dr. Pedro Fernandez-Funez, Defend|
|Attorney:||Anthony Paul Griffin, A. Griffin Lawyers, Galveston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Daniel Clark Perkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.|
|Judge Panel:||Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||December 20, 2011|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for wrongful termination, Plaintiff-Appellant Ray P. Lewis (" Lewis" ) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his claims against Defendants-Appellees University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (" UTMB" ), Dr. Garland Anderson (" Anderson" ), Dr. Tetsuo Ashizawa (" Ashizawa" ), Kirk Roden (" Roden" ), Dr. Claudio Soto (" Soto" ), and Dr. Pedro Fernandez-Funez (" Fernandez-Funez" ). We AFFIRM.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Until his termination in 2008, Lewis was employed by UTMB, a state agency, to provide information technology support. In that role, Lewis served three UTMB departments, including Neurology, the department for which Dr. Ashizawa served as Chair and in which Drs. Soto and Fernandez-Funez worked. According to Lewis, by at least late 2007, he had problems with members of the Neurology department engaging in activities, and requesting Lewis to engage in activities, which Lewis believed violated UTMB security policies. Lewis's solution was to limit Neurology department staff's administrative access to their computers, so that Lewis could review and decline activities he felt breached UTMB policy. Lewis refused requests to allow greater access by the Neurology department staff. These actions lead Drs. Soto and Fernandez-Funez to complain about Lewis's " inflexibility" to his supervisor, Marie Camp (" Camp" ). In an email to colleagues, Dr. Soto expressed a desire to " get rid of the R problem."
In early 2008, at about the time of these complaints, Lewis requested a salary adjustment to bring his salary in line with the average of similar employees. On March 1, 2008, the request was partially granted.
Shortly thereafter, on March 20, 2008, Camp and Roden, the department administrator for the Neurology department, gave Lewis a performance evaluation. The evaluation provided Lewis an overall score of " occasionally meets," the second highest of five levels. The evaluation also noted, however, certain deficiencies in Lewis's interaction with the colleagues for whom he provided information services. The evaluation stated Lewis " needs to become more professional in dealing with the departmental customers and providing their services." 1
Lewis refused to sign the evaluation, believing that it placed disproportionate emphasis on Neurology department members' complaints, which Lewis believed were baseless and originated out of his responsibility to enforce UTMB security policies. According to Lewis, because Roden would not inform him of the reason for the noted deficiencies, Lewis conducted an
in-person survey of the UTMB employees he supported. After Dr. Fernandez-Funez complained that Lewis could " use those surveys to identify the people getting him in trouble," Roden ordered Lewis to cease the survey, telling Lewis certain employees possibly felt " harassed." Lewis ceased the survey, but responded that he was " following the explicit directive [Roden] gave [him] to contact Neurology users" and " to identify what problems exist and [f]ormulate a solution[ ]."
On March 31, 2008, Camp issued a memorandum to Lewis providing a description of issues related to Lewis's work, and expectations as to each issue. The memorandum stated that " [i]t would be helpful to us if you would develop an action plan by no later than Monday, April 7, 2008," and requested Lewis to create proposed meeting agendas for weekly meetings with Camp to discuss Lewis's progress.
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP