Boltax v. Joy Day Camp
Decision Date | 14 January 1986 |
Citation | 499 N.Y.S.2d 660,67 N.Y.2d 617,490 N.E.2d 527 |
Parties | , 490 N.E.2d 527, 31 Ed. Law Rep. 196 Mark BOLTAX, Appellant, v. JOY DAY CAMP, Also Known as Kissena Park Jewish Educational Center, et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 113 A.D.2d 859, 493 N.Y.S.2d 590, should be affirmed, with costs.
To establish a prima facie case of negligence, a "plaintiff must generally show that the defendant's negligence was a substantial cause of the events which produced the injury" (Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166, 414 N.E.2d 666). When an intervening act also contributes to the plaintiff's injuries, "liability turns upon whether the intervening act is a normal or foreseeable consequence of the situation created by the defendant's negligence" (Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d at p. 315, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166, 414 N.E.2d 666, supra). Assuming for purposes of this motion for summary judgment that defendants' alleged negligence--allowing trespassers to gain entry to the pool area and dangerously maintaining the pool by having it filled below capacity and by placing a lifeguard chair near the pool's shallow end--was a causative factor in plaintiff's injuries, the reckless conduct of plaintiff, an adult experienced in swimming and knowledgeable about the general dangers of diving, who admitted his familiarity with the various water levels at each part of the pool, yet chose to dive head first from the lifeguard chair into shallow water, was an unforeseeable superseding event that absolves defendants of liability (see, Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 44, at 313-314 [5th ed 1984]; Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868 [] ). "[W]here only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts * * * the question of legal cause may be decided as a matter of law" (Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., supra, 51 N.Y.2d at p. 315, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166, 414 N.E.2d 666).
HANCOCK, J., taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vumbaca v. Terminal One Grp. Ass'n L.P.
... ... Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 660, 490 N.E.2d 527, 528 (1986). 2. Terminal Had a Duty to Plaintiff In operating its terminal, TOGA ... ...
-
Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational Industries, Inc.
... ... Mele, 134 A.D.2d 475, 521 N.Y.S.2d 260 (1987), Belling v. Haugh's Pools, Ltd., 126 A.D.2d 958, 511 N.Y.S.2d 732 (1987), Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 660, 490 N.E.2d 527 (1986), Smith v. Stark, 67 N.Y.2d 693, 499 N.Y.S.2d 922, 490 N.E.2d 841 (1986); ... ...
-
Woodling v. Garrett Corp., s. 208
... ... McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co., 11 N.Y.2d 62, 226 N.Y.S.2d 407, 181 N.E.2d 430 (1962), and Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 660, 490 N.E.2d 527 (1986), do not require a different result. Boltax is distinguishable because ... ...
-
Elmaliach v. Bank of China Ltd.
... ... defendant owed him or her a duty of reasonable care, a breach of that duty, and a resulting injury proximately caused by the breach ( see Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 660, 490 N.E.2d 527 [1986]; Hyatt v. MetroNorth Commuter R.R., 16 A.D.3d 218, 792 N.Y.S.2d 391 [1st ... ...
-
DRUNK DRIVING AND THE APPLICATION OF THE BARKER/MANNING PUBLIC POLICY DEFENSE.
...2022). (3) See, e.g., Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc., 530 N.E.2d 1280, 1281 (N.Y. 1988). (4) See, e.g., id.; Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 490 N.E.2d 527, 528 (N.Y. 1986); Blake v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. New York City, Inc., 803 N.E.2d 757 (N.Y. (5) Arbegast, 480 N.E.2d at 368 (citing Dowd v. ......