Brown v. Huffard
| Decision Date | 30 April 1879 |
| Citation | 69 Mo. 305 |
| Parties | BROWN v. HUFFARD, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas.--HON. H. G. WILSON, Judge.
W. W. Cramer for appellant.
L. Brown for respondent.
This was a suit for professional services rendered by the plaintiff, as an attorney, to the defendant. Louis Houck testified as to the value of plaintiff's services from his own knowledge. The defendant objected that the opinion of the witness as to the value of plaintiff's services could only be given upon a hypothetical case, or upon facts detailed to the jury. The objection was frivolous and was properly overruled. No other exception has been saved by defendant. The appeal is without merit, and the judgment of the common pleas court will be affirmed, with ten per cent. damages.
All concur.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Patterson v. Springfield Traction Company
...could result, naturally and directly, from the accident described. This was withn the prescribed legal limits of expert testimony. Brown v. Huffard, 69 Mo. 305; Wilbur Railroad, 110 Mo.App. 697; Reilley v. Sparks, 52 Mo.App. 574; Benjamin v. Railway, 50 Mo.App. 608; Holloway v. Kansas City,......
-
Patterson v. Springfield Traction Co.
...Mo. 347, 358, 89 S. W. 915; Holloway v. Kansas City, 184 Mo. 19, 40, 82 S. W. 89; Benjamin v. Railway Co., 50 Mo. App. 602, 608; Brown v. Huffard, 69 Mo. 305; Jones v. Traction Co., 137 Mo. App. 408, 415, 118 S. W. 675; Wilbur v. Railroad Co., 110 Mo. App. 689, 697, 85 S. W. 671; Porter v. ......
-
Heinzle v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.
... ... could express himself as an expert. Kaminski v. Tudor ... Iron Works, 167 Mo. 466; Brown v. Hufford, 69 ... Mo. 305; Benjamin v. Railroad, 50 Mo.App. 602; ... Rogers, Exp. Ev., 70-75; Lawson, Exp. Test., 275. Under the ... evidence ... ...
- City of St. Louis v. Sternberg