Continental Ins. Co. v. Vallandingham & Gentry
Citation | 116 Ky. 287,76 S.W. 22 |
Parties | CONTINENTAL INS. CO. et al. v. VALLANDINGHAM & GENTRY. |
Decision Date | 25 September 1903 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kentucky |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Owen County.
"To be officially reported."
Action by Vallandingham & Gentry against the Continental Insurance Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Chas Strother, John S. Gaunt, Frank C. Green, and Bargen & Hicks for appellants.
Lindsay & Botts and W. S. Pryor, for appellees.
O'REAR J.
Appellees effected an insurance for $6,000 with appellants, six fire insurance companies, upon a stock of general merchandise at Wheatley, Ky. By the reason of the burning of an adjacent building, threatening the one containing the insured goods appellees removed the goods into the street and to a nearby lot. In the excitement, hurry, and reckless manner of handling by the crowd the goods were badly damaged by being soiled and otherwise abused. These suits are to recover the amount of the damage, laid, at $4,000. The principal defense is that the insured failed and refused to submit the amount of their loss or damage to arbitration or appraisement, as required by the policies. All the policies are alike in this particular. Their form is what is known as the "New York Standard Policy." The clause in question is as follows The fire occurred on the night of November 1st. The insurance companies were promptly notified of the loss, and sent adjusters. Failing to agree upon the amount of the loss, on December 7th following the insurers and the insured entered into an "agreement for submission to appraisers," the material part of which, so far as affects the question now in hand, is as follows: Boerner was selected by the insured, and Boyd by the insurers. Boerner was a merchant living in a village some few miles from Wheatley. Boyd was a merchant living at Columbus, Ohio. The arbitrators spent most of the day of December 7th in trying to agree upon an umpire, but failed. All names then proposed by each were rejected by the other. About 2 or 3 o'clock in the afternoon Boerner announced that they were unable to agree on an umpire, and signed an indorsement to that effect on the appraisal agreement. Boyd did not sign it, but did not then offer to make further effort toward an agreement. Boyd and the adjuster for the insurance companies left together. That evening, after they had arrived at the railroad station some miles from Wheatley, Boyd wrote to Boerner, offering to reopen the matter. Boerner responded some days later that he had nothing more to do with it, and that the insured had opened their store ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Airlines, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson CAB
...Co. v. Cox, 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 876, 881; see: Jones v. Jones, 1929, 229 Ky. 71, 16 S.W.2d 503; Continental Insurance Company v. Vallandingham & Gentry, 1903, 116 Ky. 287, 76 S.W. 22, where as here the contract evidences a transaction "involving commerce" 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, Kentucky la......
-
Schwartzman v. London & Lancashire Fire Ins. Co., Limited, of Liverpool, England
......65; Remington v. London Assur. Co., 43 N.Y.S. 431; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vanlandingham, 116 Ky. 287; Van Winkle v. Fire Ins. Co., 55 W.Va. 286; Mason v. ......
-
Schwartzman v. Fire Insurance Co.
...Co., 185 Fed. 981; Stemmer v. Scottish Union & National, 33 Ore. 65; Remington v. London Assur. Co., 43 N.Y. Supp. 431; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vanlandingham, 116 Ky. 287; Van Winkle v. Fire Ins. Co., 55 W. Va. 286; Mason v. Ins. Co. (Mo. App), 258 S.W. 759; Bishop v. Ins. Co., 130 N.Y. 563......
-
Carp v. Queen Insurance Company of America
...... Murphy v. North British, etc., Ins. Co., 61 Mo.App. 323; McNees v. Ins. Co., 61 Mo.App. 335; Ostrander. ...Ins. Co., 89 Wis. 572, 62. N.W. 422; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vallandingham, 116. Ky. 287, 76 S.W. 22. An appraiser, by ......