Continental Ins. Co. v. Vallandingham & Gentry

Citation116 Ky. 287,76 S.W. 22
PartiesCONTINENTAL INS. CO. et al. v. VALLANDINGHAM & GENTRY.
Decision Date25 September 1903
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

Appeal from Circuit Court, Owen County.

"To be officially reported."

Action by Vallandingham & Gentry against the Continental Insurance Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Chas Strother, John S. Gaunt, Frank C. Green, and Bargen & Hicks for appellants.

Lindsay & Botts and W. S. Pryor, for appellees.

O'REAR J.

Appellees effected an insurance for $6,000 with appellants, six fire insurance companies, upon a stock of general merchandise at Wheatley, Ky. By the reason of the burning of an adjacent building, threatening the one containing the insured goods appellees removed the goods into the street and to a nearby lot. In the excitement, hurry, and reckless manner of handling by the crowd the goods were badly damaged by being soiled and otherwise abused. These suits are to recover the amount of the damage, laid, at $4,000. The principal defense is that the insured failed and refused to submit the amount of their loss or damage to arbitration or appraisement, as required by the policies. All the policies are alike in this particular. Their form is what is known as the "New York Standard Policy." The clause in question is as follows "This company shall not be liable beyond the actual cash value of the property at the time any loss or damage occurs, and the loss or damage shall be ascertained or estimated according to such actual cash value, with proper deduction for depreciation, however caused, and shall in no event exceed what it would then cost the insured to repair or replace the same with material of like kind and quality; said ascertainment or estimate shall be made by the insured and this company, or if they differ, then by appraisers as hereinafter provided, and the amount of loss or damage having been thus determined, the sum for which this company is liable pursuant to this policy shall be payable sixty days after due notice, ascertainment, estimate and satisfactory proof of the loss have been received by this company in accordance with the terms of this policy. *** In the event of disagreement as to the amount of the loss the same shall, as above provided, be ascertained by two competent and disinterested appraisers, the insured and this company each selecting one, and the two so chosen shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire; the appraisers together shall then estimate and appraise the loss, stating separately sound value and damage, and, failing to agree, shall submit their differences to the umpire; and the award in writing of any two shall determine the amount of such loss; the parties thereto shall pay the appraiser selected by them and shall bear equally the expenses of the appraisal and umpire. *** And the loss shall not become payable until sixty days after the notice, ascertainment, estimate and satisfactory proof of the loss herein required have been received by this company, including an award by appraisers when appraisal has been required. *** No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustained in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the insured with all the foregoing requirements. *** This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions." The fire occurred on the night of November 1st. The insurance companies were promptly notified of the loss, and sent adjusters. Failing to agree upon the amount of the loss, on December 7th following the insurers and the insured entered into an "agreement for submission to appraisers," the material part of which, so far as affects the question now in hand, is as follows: "This agreement made and entered into by and between Vallandingham & Gentry, of Wheatley, Kentucky, of the first part, and the insurance company or companies whose name or names are signed hereto of the second part, each for itself and not jointly, witnesseth, that C. G. Boerner and T. J. Boyd shall appraise and ascertain the sound value of and the loss upon the property damaged and destroyed by the fire of November 1, 1900, as specified below. Provided, that the said appraisers shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire, who shall act with them in matters of difference only. The award of any two of them, made in writing, in accordance with this agreement, shall be binding upon both parties to this agreement as to the amount of such loss. It is expressly understood that this agreement and appraisement is for the purpose of ascertaining and fixing the amount of sound value and loss and damage only to the property hereinafter described, and taken into consideration every article on schedule attached hereto, whether totally or partially destroyed, and is to be in settlement of the entire loss, and shall not determine, waive, or invalidate any other right or rights of either party to this agreement." Boerner was selected by the insured, and Boyd by the insurers. Boerner was a merchant living in a village some few miles from Wheatley. Boyd was a merchant living at Columbus, Ohio. The arbitrators spent most of the day of December 7th in trying to agree upon an umpire, but failed. All names then proposed by each were rejected by the other. About 2 or 3 o'clock in the afternoon Boerner announced that they were unable to agree on an umpire, and signed an indorsement to that effect on the appraisal agreement. Boyd did not sign it, but did not then offer to make further effort toward an agreement. Boyd and the adjuster for the insurance companies left together. That evening, after they had arrived at the railroad station some miles from Wheatley, Boyd wrote to Boerner, offering to reopen the matter. Boerner responded some days later that he had nothing more to do with it, and that the insured had opened their store ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson CAB
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • September 18, 1959
    ...Co. v. Cox, 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 876, 881; see: Jones v. Jones, 1929, 229 Ky. 71, 16 S.W.2d 503; Continental Insurance Company v. Vallandingham & Gentry, 1903, 116 Ky. 287, 76 S.W. 22, where as here the contract evidences a transaction "involving commerce" 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, Kentucky la......
  • Schwartzman v. London & Lancashire Fire Ins. Co., Limited, of Liverpool, England
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 4, 1928
    ......65; Remington v. London Assur. Co., 43 N.Y.S. 431; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vanlandingham, 116 Ky. 287; Van Winkle v. Fire Ins. Co., 55 W.Va. 286; Mason v. ......
  • Schwartzman v. Fire Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 4, 1928
    ...Co., 185 Fed. 981; Stemmer v. Scottish Union & National, 33 Ore. 65; Remington v. London Assur. Co., 43 N.Y. Supp. 431; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vanlandingham, 116 Ky. 287; Van Winkle v. Fire Ins. Co., 55 W. Va. 286; Mason v. Ins. Co. (Mo. App), 258 S.W. 759; Bishop v. Ins. Co., 130 N.Y. 563......
  • Carp v. Queen Insurance Company of America
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • February 16, 1904
    ...... Murphy v. North British, etc., Ins. Co., 61 Mo.App. 323; McNees v. Ins. Co., 61 Mo.App. 335; Ostrander. ...Ins. Co., 89 Wis. 572, 62. N.W. 422; Continental Ins. Co. v. Vallandingham, 116. Ky. 287, 76 S.W. 22. An appraiser, by ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT