JJ Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc., 4D02-1953.

Decision Date28 May 2003
Docket NumberNo. 4D02-1953.,4D02-1953.
Citation847 So.2d 1048
PartiesJ.J. GUMBERG CO., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. JANIS SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Colonia Insurance Company, a Delaware corporation, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Caryn L. Bellus and Valentina Tejera of Kubicki Draper, Miami, for appellant.

Jerome A. Pivnik of Pivnik & Nitsche, P.A., Miami, for appellee Janis Services, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, J.J. Gumberg Co. (Gumberg), appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of the complaint it filed against appellee, Janis Services, Inc. (Janis), in October 2001. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In May 1994, Janis entered into a construction contract to remodel the food court at the Coral Ridge Mall which was maintained and operated by Gumberg. On June 29, 1994, an employee of Janis, Samuel Green, was injured while working at the Mall. Green filed suit against Gumberg in case number 97-12195 and Gumberg filed a third party complaint containing three counts against Janis. Count I was for contractual indemnity, Count II was for contribution, and Count III was for common law indemnity. Upon Janis's motion to dismiss, Counts II and III were dismissed with prejudice and the remaining count, alleging contractual indemnity, was set for trial in January 2001.

Shortly before trial, Gumberg filed a motion for leave to amend its third party complaint to amend its claim for contractual indemnity and add two claims for breach of contract, and one for declaratory relief. The trial court denied the motion to amend. Gumberg settled with Green and the trial court entered a partial order of dismissal. Gumberg renewed its motion to amend which the trial court denied. The contractual indemnity suit against Janis remains pending.

In October 2001, Gumberg filed a new complaint against Janis and Colonia Insurance Company, Janis's insurance company. There were two counts against Janis for breach of the construction contract and one count for declaratory relief against Janis and Colonia. These counts were essentially the same as three of the counts proposed in Gumberg's motion to amend in case number 97-12195. This new cause, case number 01-17838, was transferred to the trial judge presiding over case number 97-12195.

Janis then filed a motion to dismiss Gumberg's new complaint arguing that each claim was barred by the statute of limitations1 and further that the claims should be dismissed for improper splitting of causes of action. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice as to all three counts without stating the grounds for its dismissal.

The two claims for breach of contract are based upon Gumberg's allegations that Janis breached the provisions of the contract requiring Janis to obtain liability insurance and to keep the construction area clean and follow safety precautions. In Abbott Lab., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital, 765 So.2d 737, 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), the court held that "[u]nder section 95.11(2)(b), the limitations period begins to run when `the last element constituting the cause of action occurs.' § 95.031(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). The elements of a breach of contract action are: (1) a valid contract; (2) a material breach; and (3) damages." Assuming that Janis breached the contract by failing to obtain liability insurance and by failing to clean up and maintain safety precautions at the time Green was injured in June of 1994, all the elements for a cause of action for breach of contract existed. Therefore, the trial court correctly dismissed these two claims as they are...

To continue reading

Request your trial
55 cases
  • Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp. v. MDG Powerline Holdings, LLC (In re Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 28 Enero 2022
    ...656, 657 (11th Cir. 1984).134 Knowles v. C. I. T. Corp. , 346 So. 2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) ; J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Servs., Inc. , 847 So. 2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ; Rollins, Inc. v. Butland , 951 So. 2d 860, 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Alhassid v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 2015......
  • Acheron Portfolio Tr. v. Mukamal
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 24 Septiembre 2021
    ... ... USA, LLC v. Transcarga Int'l Airways, C.A., Inc. , ... No. 17-20768-CIV, 2017 WL 4898292, at *3 (S.D ... to the disposition services routinely conducted by ... Litai.” (DE 76 at ¶50) ... (citing J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Servs., Inc. , 847 ... So.2d 1048, 1049 ... ...
  • Sensormatic Security Corporation v. Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 7 Septiembre 2006
    ...Beach, Inc., No. 4D05-1760, ___ So.2d ___, 2006 WL 1083940, at *1 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. April 26, 2006); J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Servs., Inc., 847 So.2d 1048, 1049 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2003); Abbott Labs., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital, 765 So.2d 737, 740 Sales by third parties implicate two section......
  • Melvin v. Walmart Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • 9 Noviembre 2021
    ...(3) damages.” Friedman v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co., 985 So.2d 56, 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008) (citing J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Servs., Inc., 847 So.2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)). To plausibly state a breach-of-contract claim, therefore, a plaintiff first must plausibly allege that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Contract cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • 1 Abril 2022
    ...3. Sulkin v. All Florida Pain Management, Inc. , 932 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). 4. J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc ., 847 So.2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). 5. Miller v. Nifakos , 655 So.2d 192, 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (“To establish a breach of contract, a party must sh......
  • Business & commercial cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • 1 Abril 2022
    ...Codman, Inc. v. Wackenhut Corrections Corp. , 941 So.2d 396, 398 (4th DCA 2006), quoting J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc. , 847 So.2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). §4:10.1.5 Elements of Cause of Action — 5th DCA To establish a claim for account stated, a plaintiff must establish a......
  • Chapter 13-4 Proof of Elements at Trial
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2022 Chapter 13 Foreclosure Trials and Evidence
    • Invalid date
    ...Services, Inc., 990 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).[43] Fla. Stat. § 90.401.[44] See, e.g., J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).[45] Figueroa v. Federal Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 180 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (quoting Gorel v. Bank of New York......
  • Chapter 13-4 Proof of Elements at Trial
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Florida Foreclosure Law 2020 Title Chapter 13 Foreclosure Trials and Evidence
    • Invalid date
    ...Services, Inc., 990 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).[41] Fla. Stat. § 90.401.[42] See, e.g., J.J. Gumberg Co. v. Janis Services, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1048, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).[43] Figueroa v. Federal Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 180 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (quoting Gorel v. Bank of New York......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT