Barrel Fitting & S. Corp. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co.
Decision Date | 05 January 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 5261.,5261. |
Parties | BARREL FITTING & SEAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN FLANGE & MFG. CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Thorley von Holst, Sidney Neuman, and Joseph F. Devereux, Jr., all of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Frank Parker Davis and Harry W. Lindsey, Jr., both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before EVANS and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.
Were claims 8 and 10 of Patent No. 1,838,042, issued to Henry Schwartz, covering a "Bushing Structure and Sealing Means Therefor" infringed by appellee? The District Court found they were not infringed. Appellee also argues that both claims are invalid for want of patentable novelty. The claims are set forth verbatim in the margin.*
The issue of infringement turns upon the construction of the claims in the light of the explanation which the applicant made to the Examiner in the Patent Office. In his specifications the applicant said that his invention had special reference to a structure such as is used as a bung for metallic barrels and other containers usually employed in storing or shipping oils or other liquids; that the bung or plug was so constructed as to prevent a leakage of the liquid from the container during the shipping or storage thereof and also a means for preventing access to the bung or plug in order to guard against an unauthorized opening of the barrel or container. The plug or bung is cast with the usual tool engaging formations on the outer end portion thereof and is externally threaded to engage an internally threaded bushing of the barrel or container. In lieu of the usual sealing gasket between the bung and the bushing or between the bung and the wall of the container, a peripheral groove is cast or otherwise formed on the upper portion of the bung in which groove is cast a material which is softer than either the material of the bung or of the bushing. The cast material in the groove is initially unthreaded and the peripheral contour thereof is coextensive with the external threads of the bung. When the bung is threaded in the bushing, the latter forms threads in the cast material, thereby providing a leakproof joint therebetween.
Describing appellee's structure, the District Court said:
He further said when his claims were amended and restricted.
"The gist...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.
...in such claims. W. F. Burns Co. v. Automatic Recording Safe Co., 241 F. 472, 482 (7 Cir., 1916); See Barrel Fitting & S. Corp. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co., 74 F.2d 569 (7 Cir., 1935); Bassick Co. v. Faultless Caster Corporation, 105 F.2d 228, 231 (7 Cir., 1939); Plax Corp. v. Elmer E. Mil......
-
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
...the Patent Office in obtaining the allowance of his claims was considered at length in the case of Barrel Fitting & Seal Corp. of America v. American Flange & Mfg. Co., 1935, 74 F.2d 569, where the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit had before it a patent on a barrel fitting or closur......
-
Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.
...an amendment in order to achieve allowance of claims have the effect of a file wrapper estoppel. Barrel Fitting & Seal Corp. of America v. American Flange Mfg. Co., 74 F.2d 569 (7th Cir.1935); Sager v. Glove Corp., 118 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1941). See also, Scheller-Globe Corp. v. Milsco Manufa......
-
Beegle v. Thomson
...thing he claimed. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp., 315 U.S. 126, 62 S.Ct. 513, 86 L.Ed. 736; Barrel Fitting & Seal Corp. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 74 F.2d 569. Did defendants infringe? Beegle's teaching, as disclosed by his description and specification of terminals for......