Johnson v. L. &. N. R. Co.
Decision Date | 01 February 1918 |
Citation | 179 Ky. 81 |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Parties | Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. |
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.
O'REAR & WILLIAMS and L. FRANK WITHERS for appellant.
T. L. EDELEN and SHELBY, NORTHCUTT & SHELBY for appellee.
This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the first appeal is found in 168 Kentucky 351.
The case has been tried in the circuit court three times. On the first trial the jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars; this verdict and judgment was set aside and a new trial granted by the lower court. On the second trial plaintiff recovered a verdict of six thousand ($6,000) dollars, and the motion and grounds for new trial being overruled, it was appealed to this court and reversed with directions to peremptorily instruct the jury to find for the defendant upon another trial if the evidence produced by plaintiff was substantially the same as upon the second trial.
Upon the third trial in the circuit court the jury was peremptorily instructed to find and return a verdict for the defendant railroad company, upon which verdict judgment was entered, and from which Johnson appeals, insisting that upon the third trial he introduced a new witness who gave evidence not only supplementing that given upon the other trials, but, in addition, testifying in substance that the train gave an unusual jerk in attempting to start at the time plaintiff was injured. Except for this new witness, Homer Wise, it is admitted the evidence is substantially the same as upon the second trial.
The rule of this court that the opinion on the first appeal on all points discussed therein, is the law of the case on all subsequent trials is too well established and too generally recognized to need re-statement or argument here. This rule is stated and recognized in the following cases: Kirchdorf v. Ward, 167 Ky. 298; Adams Express Co. v. Hoeing, 88 Ky. 373; Petit v. Marble, 18 R. 167; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Queen City Coal Co., 99 Ky. 217; Schmetzer, by, etc., v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 19 Rep. 1713; Iser v. Davis, 18 Rep. 510; Brown, Assignee v. Marion National Bank, 18 Rep. 186; Hopkins v. Adams Roth Grocery Co., 105 Ky. 357; Martin v. Spurlock, 122 S. W. 125; Brooks v. City of Maysville, 151 Ky. 707; Mahoney v. Mentz's Assignee, 153 Ky. 484; Doherty v. First Nat. Bank, 161 Ky. 202.
In the first opinion the facts are found as follows:
Upon the last trial plaintiff, Johnson, testified and called a number of witnesses, including Homer Wise, a newsboy, who testified for the first time. The evidence of Homer Wise is largely cumulative, since it relates to subjects fairly covered by witnesses upon the first and second trial, but in addition he gives an account of the jerking of the train, and it is, therefore, contended that his evidence entitles the plaintiff to go to the jury upon the question of whether the train started with a sudden jerk, causing the injury of plaintiff. His evidence upon this subject is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Hay
...jerk, by means of which a passenger is thrown from the train or otherwise injured, the company is liable." In Johnson v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 179 Ky. 81, 200 S.W. 50, L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Kemp's Adm'r was again cited this court as authority for this statement: It is manifest from this evidenc......