Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson
Decision Date | 14 May 1924 |
Docket Number | (No. 1109.) |
Citation | 262 S.W. 118 |
Parties | ÆTNA LIFE INS. CO. v. ROBINSON. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; J. D. Harvey, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Mary Ellen Robinson against the Ætna Life Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, of Houston, for appellant.
B. F. Louis, of Houston, for appellee.
On the 19th day of February, 1912, appellant issued to Charles William Robinson, the husband of appellee, an accident policy in the principal sum of $7,500. Mr. Robinson died on the 23d day of January, 1922, with the policy in full force and effect. On appellant's refusal to pay the amount claimed under the accident features of the policy, appellee instituted this suit, and was awarded judgment for $7,500, the amount of the policy contract, $337.50 interest, $900 statutory penalty, and $2,500 attorney's fees. There was testimony on all the circumstances embodied by appellant in the following hypothetical question:
The contract further provided:
"The company shall have the right and opportunity to examine the body of the assured when and so often as it requires in the case of injury, and also have the right and opportunity to make an autopsy to determine the cause of death when it so requires."
Said contract further provides in paragraph E, part XIII:
"* * * A failure to comply with any of the requirements contained herein shall invalidate all claims under this policy."
The following special issues were submitted to the jury, and answered as indicated:
Answer: "It was."
Answer: "It was."
Answer: "$2,500.00."
Answer: "It was."
Opinion.Appellant, in connection with a proper charge on the burden of proof, requested the court to submit to the jury the following definition of the term "effected solely through external means":
"The term `effected solely through external, violent and accidental means' means that the element of accident must consist in that which produces the injury rather than in the mere fact that an injury occurs."
This charge was refused, and in lieu thereof the court submitted to the jury the following definitions of the terms "accidental" and "accident":
"You are further charged in this case that the terms `accident' and `accidental,' as used in the charge and special issues submitted to you by the court, are employed in their ordinary and popular sense, as meaning happening by chance; unexpectedly taking place; not according to the usual course of things; or not as expected; an event which takes place without the foresight or expectation of the person acted upon."
Appellant's definition of the term "accidental means" should have been given. Our Supreme Court, following the Supreme Court of the United States, draws a distinction between death by "accidental means" and an "accidental death." In Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co., 107 Tex. 582, 182 S. W. 673, L. R. A. 1916E, 945, Ann. Cas. 1918A, 517, it was said:
And, again, it was said, in Pledger v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n (Tex. Com. App.) 228 S. W. 110:
On the facts of this case, if Robinson slipped and fell upon the pavement, inflicting the injuries from which he died, his death would have been occasioned by "accidental means"; but if because of a fainting spell, or some other bodily infirmity, he was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bloom v. Brotherhood Accident Co.
... ... Co. of N.Y., 158 F. 1, 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1206; ... Standard Life & Acc. Co. v. Schmaltz, 66 Ark. 588, ... 53 S.W. 49; Horsfall v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co., ... 32 Wash. 132, 72 P. 1028; AEtna Life Insurance Company v ... Robinson, 262 S.W. 118; Byrant v. Continental ... Casualty Co., 182 S.W. 673, L ... ...
-
International Travelers' Ass'n v. Melaun
...bear upon the questions herein discussed: American Natl. Ins. Co. v. Nuckols (Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S. W. 497; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 262 S. W. 118; Crotty v. Continental Casualty Co., 163 Mo. App. 628, 146 S. W. 833; Wehle v. Mutual Accident Ass'n, 153 N. Y. 116, 47 ......
-
City of Beaumont v. Kane
...street and that a stranger might drive off into the river believing that he was on Pearl street. This court, in Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Robinson, 262 S. W. 118, 122, discussing this proposition, "Of course, this testimony of the witness was a mere conclusion, but when it is not possible......
-
Colls v. Price's Creameries, 4840
...such cases the conclusion of a lay witness is admissible, citing Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Jarrard, 65 Tex. 560; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson, Tex.Civ.App., 262 S.W. 118, loc. cit. 121(6), modified and affirmed, Tex.Com.App., 276 S.W. 900, and other authorities. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. ......