Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co.

Decision Date02 March 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-3042 Summary Calendar.,71-3042 Summary Calendar.
Citation455 F.2d 957
PartiesKAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARSHLAND DREDGING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

F. W. Middleton, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

James H. Daigle, New Orleans, La., E. Leland Richardson, Baton Rouge, La., George B. Matthews, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Claiming diminishment of its gas supply caused by Marshland's fracture of the underwater line of its supplier, Sugar Bowl Gas Company, Kaiser sued Marshland for consequential damages. From an adverse summary judgment for Marshland, Kaiser appeals. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. A barge owned by Marshland Dredging, while engaged in cleaning an outfall canal entering the Mississippi under a contract with Humble Oil, dropped a heavy anchor which punctured a high pressure gas pipeline owned and operated by Sugar Bowl Gas Company. This puncture caused immediate interruption of gas fuel service to Kaiser's production plant located a short distance north of the point where the pipeline was damaged, resulting in shutdown expenses and production losses of $170,229, for which Kaiser seeks recovery. The gas fuel was being supplied to Kaiser under contract by Sugar Bowl Gas.

In granting summary judgment, the trial judge relied primarily on Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 1927, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290, that "as a general rule, * * * a tort to the person or property of one man does not make the tortfeasor liable to another merely because the injured person was under a contract with that other unknown to the doer of the wrong." 275 U.S. at 309, 48 S.Ct. at 135.

We agree that recovery by Kaiser is precluded as a matter of law because there is (1) no contention that the interference with Kaiser's contract rights was intentional; (2) no evidence that Marshland had knowledge of the existence of the contract between Kaiser and Sugar Bowl Gas, and (3) no showing of facts, by affidavit or otherwise, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, sufficient to create a genuine issue for trial, of anything more than merely the negligent interference with contract rights. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • State of La. ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 11, 1985
    ...refused to allow recovery for economic loss absent physical damage to a proprietary interest. In Kaiser Aluminium & Chemical Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co., Inc., 455 F.2d 957 (5th Cir.1972), the plaintiff lost gas supplies when the defendant negligently broke a gas pipeline. We held that ......
  • Hamilton v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • May 15, 1975
    ...law does not recognize an action for negligent interference with a contractual relationship. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co., 5th Cir. 1972, 455 F.2d 957. VI. LIABILITY OF CENTRAL At the conclusion of the trial, I indicated that Central Marine should be exonerated......
  • Plains Pipeline, L.P. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • August 29, 2014
    ...to transport crude oil and other petroleum products.”).2 Def. Mem. 2 n. 1, R. Doc. 39.3 See, e.g., Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co., 455 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir.1972) (denying recovery where owner of production plant suffered losses from interruption of gas services du......
  • Federal Commerce & Nav. Co., Ltd. v. M/V MARATHONIAN
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 8, 1975
    ...(5 ed. 1968); G. Robinson, Handbook of Admiralty Law § 83 at 593-600 (1939). 3 See, e. g., Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co., 455 F.2d 957, 958 (5 Cir. 1972) (per curiam); J. Ray McDermott & Co. v. S. S. Egero, 453 F.2d 1202, 1203-04 (5 Cir. 1972); Keene Lumber Co. v. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and the Limits of Civil Liability
    • United States
    • University of Washington School of Law University of Washington Law Review No. 86-1, September 2016
    • Invalid date
    ...469, 472-74 (5th Cir. 1979); Dick Meyers Towing Serv., 577 F.2d at 1024-25; Kaiser Aluminum and Chem. Corp. v. Marshland Dredging Co., 455 F.2d 957, 958 (5th Cir. 62. See Perry, The Economic Bias, supra note 20, at 1613-17. 63. See, e.g.. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. N.Y. and New Haven R.R.,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT