People v. Peña, 4296.

Decision Date16 October 2008
Docket Number4296.,5245/03.,1004/03.
Citation55 A.D.3d 393,866 N.Y.S.2d 37,2008 NY Slip Op 7791
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID PEÑA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of the application. Defendant's record of increasingly serious crimes, along with his illegal reentry into the United States and resumption of drug trafficking after being deported for such activity, outweighed evidence of his rehabilitation while incarcerated (see People v Alcaraz, 46 AD3d 253 [2007]). In denying resentencing, the court properly considered the totality of circumstances and did not rely solely on defendant's advantageous plea bargain (see People v Jones, 50 AD3d 282 [2008]).

Concur—Saxe, J.P., Catterson, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. De La Cruz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2018
    ...from custody and deported ( People v. Rodriguez, 68 A.D.3d 543, 543, 889 N.Y.S.2d 459 [1st Dept. 2009] ; see People v. Pen~a, 55 A.D.3d 393, 393, 866 N.Y.S.2d 37 [1st Dept. 2008] ; People v. Alcaraz, 46 A.D.3d 253, 253, 847 N.Y.S.2d 61 [1st Dept. 2007] ), as well as defendant's numerous dis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT